To compare the views of Spital & Erin and Annas on the morality of
procuring and allocating organs for transplantation is given below
Explanation:
Major ethical concerns about organ donation by living related donors focus on the possibility of undue influence and emotional pressure and coercion. By contrast, the living unrelated donor lacks genetic ties to the recipient.
Utility, justice, and respect for persons are three foundational ethical principles that create a framework for the equitable allocation of scarce organs for transplantation.
Matching donor organs with transplant candidates
Using the combination of donor and candidate information, the UNOS computer system generates a “match run,” a rank-order list of candidates to be offered each organ. This match is unique to each donor and each organ.
Factors in organ allocation
When a transplant hospital accepts a person as a transplant candidate, it enters medical data—information such as the person's blood type and medical urgency and the location of the transplant hospital—about that candidate into UNOS' computerized network.
Finally the two major ethical issues that are of considerable concern are the autonomy of the donor and recipient and the utility of the procedure. The transplant team must inform the donor of all the risks. The recipient must also accept that the donor is placing himself at great risk
Answer:
The role of the immune system — a collection of structures and processes within the body — is to protect against disease or other potentially damaging foreign bodies.
Explanation:
1. Describe the appearance of the valves of a heart. How the anatomy of the valves helps do their function?
2. Explain how the heart could compensate for changes in peripheral resistance.
3. Where in the heart the thickness of the heart varies? Why?
Answer:
The correct answer to this question: Evaluation of evidence should be based solely upon study design:____, would be: false.
Explanation:
According to research done on the topic, there are many other issues that must be taken into account when evaluating the results of a research study, be it clinical, or in the field, and not simply study design. Study design allows the evaluators to assess the style, the form, and the way in which the study was carried out to reach results, but evaluating results, the evidence gathered only based on how the study was designed would be wrong. This evidence evaluation should focus primarily on how the intervention worked on a certain study, and whether it was carried out in such a way that would yield the proper results, without bias.
