The answer about empathy and cooperation are inevitable in diversified country like Nepal, is explained below.
Explanation:
When people understand and share the feelings of other people, then this ability of the people is called as empathy.
When people work together and help each other towards a combined end, this is called as cooperation.
So in a country like Nepal, which is full of people from different cultures, religions, ethnicity, etc, the feelings of being empathetic and cooperative with each other is inevitable. People have to interact and cooperate with each other in every field of life in such countries. So they can't ignore the importance of being empathetic and cooperative.
Learn more about Diversity at:
brainly.com/question/685315
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
inanity
Explanation:
According to my research, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Cooper should have paid more attention to the inanity of the site. This term refers to nonsensical remarks or actions. This is because if he would have looked at the site more in depth, he would have seen lots of these nonsensical remarks and eventually realized it was a fiction-writing site before posting the article.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Article V creates a two-stage process for amending the Constitution: proposal and ratification. An amendment can be proposed by two-thirds of both houses of Congress or... By two-thirds of state legislatures requesting Congress to call a national convention to propose amendments.
Answer:
<h3>Freedom of speech.</h3>
Explanation:
- Freedom of speech is a principal that advocates the freedom of a person to state his/her opinion freely and to impart information and ideas without any restrictions.
- However, in the case of Schenk v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution does not protect a person when "falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing panic" because freedom of speech does not protect speech that has the potential to incite danger and disharmony in the society.
- Therefore, in the case of Schenk v. United States, freedom of speech of First Amendment was limited.
B. <span>Private individuals and businesses ought to answer most economic questions for themselves.</span>
