Answer:
So i just used the calculator to help me find the two co exisiting lines and then worked my way up to find the nearest decimal to fit the equation for the missing parablar length which was parallel to find the cointerior angle which lead me to get a decimal number involving an ordinary form number.
<span>The following indicate that a linear model is not the best fit for a dataset:
</span><span>
• Scatterplot shows a curve pattern.
• Residual plot shows no pattern.
• Correlation coefficient is close to 1 or –1.
</span><span>
</span>I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly. We hope to answer more of your questions and inquiries soon. Have a nice day ahead!<span><span>
</span>
</span>
Answer:
1. 60 snickers
2. 20 KitKats
i cannot anwser 3 cause its not showing up somehow. Sorry.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let N be the number of items sold and p the price.
Since the variation is inverse, then the relation between N and p is:
For N=20000 and p = $9.5, we get the formula:
If p = 8.75, then the number of items sold can be computed using the formula:
To answer this we just need to set up a equation:-
895 - 669 - 100 = 126.
SO, after these transactions you will have $126 left.
Hope I helped ya!!
