Lets split the box in pieces and then add:
top = 20*15 = 300
sidesA = 2*20*9 = 360, is multiplied by 2 cause there are 2 sides like this
sidesB = 2*9*15 = 270, is multiplied by 2 cause there are 2 sides like this
so in total we have:
total = 300 + 360 + 270 = 930 cm^2
if we express this quantity in mm^2 we have:
<span>1cm² = 100 mm²</span>total = 930*100 = 93000 mm^2
so if the tiles are 5 mm^2 we need:
total tiles = <span>93000/5 = 18600
we need 18600 tiles of 5 mm^2</span>
Answer:
21 is a composite number
Step-by-step explanation:
It is a composite because multiple numbers can go in it like 3 and 7 so it is a composite number
Draw a diagram to illustrate problem as shown below.
Let h = the height of the tree.
Because ΔABC ~ ΔADE, therefore
DE/BC = AD/AB
That is,
h/1.94 = (5.1 + 10.2)/5.1 = 3
h = 1.94*3 = 5.82 m
Answer: 5.82 m
Answer:
By the Central Limit Theorem, both would be approximately normal and have the same mean. The difference is in the standard deviation, since as the sample size increases, the standard deviation decreases. So the SRS of 600 would have a smaller standard deviation than the SRS of 200.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Central Limit Theorem estabilishes that, for a normally distributed random variable X, with mean
and standard deviation
, the sampling distribution of the sample means with size n can be approximated to a normal distribution with mean
and standard deviation
.
For a skewed variable, the Central Limit Theorem can also be applied, as long as n is at least 30.
For the sampling distribution of size n of a sample proportion p, the mean is p and the standard deviation is 
Differences between SRS of 200 and of 600
By the Central Limit Theorem, both would be approximately normal and have the same mean. The difference is in the standard deviation, since as the sample size increases, the standard deviation decreases. So the SRS of 600 would have a smaller standard deviation than the SRS of 200.