Hi there!
The principle of SOCIAL CONFORMITY.
It showed that people tend to engage behaviours more likely in confirmation of the society at large.
The interesting question is when everybody is thinking about confirming then who decide what behavior to engage in, from the start? That is if we are supposed to DRINK in a Social gathering when all are drinking. Then who thought that Drinking is to be done by all, or who sets the social norm and how is the degree of strictness understood and enforced?
is it something we just think and that the norms doesn't actually exist?
Some food for thought!
hope it make sense!
Answer:
A. Federal law always supercedes state law.
Explanation:
Gibbons v. Ogden was a Supreme Court case which held that the Congress of the United States of America had authority, jurisdiction and power to regulate any interstate commerce with respect to the Commerce Clause of the Constitution.
In New York city, the state legislature granted a monopoly to Robert R. Livingston and Robert Fulton an exclusive navigation rights or privileges of operating on all New York state waters with boats that are being moved either by steam or fire, for a time frame of thirty (30) years. Aaron Orgedon was the governor.
In Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), the Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Marshall, ruled that in business disputes, federal law always supercedes state law. It held that the permission granted to the state, New York city was monopolistic and as such was not permitted.
That 'so important' status is known as master status.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
when I Think Privacy Is The Individual Based System. For Instance, When We Open Our Googile Account We Accept Our Privacy Policy. It Is All Individual Based For Security Purpose.
