Answer:
The president of Riggs has missed something.
She should make the Sail instead of buying because its cheaper to manufacture than purchasing it outside.
Explanation:
<u>Cost of Manufacturing the Sails:</u>
Direct materials $93
Direct Labor $83
Total $173
The president of Riggs has included the $90 overhead based on $78,000 of annual fixed overhead that is allocated using normal capacity in the cost of manufacturing the sail which is incorrect.
Riggs Company is operating at 80 % of full capacity, hence utelizing the 20% excess capacity would not expand its fixed costs.
Thus said the current fixed cost are irrelevent for this decison and would be incurred whether or not Riggs Company utilizes the excess capacity
<u>Conclusion:</u>
The cost of making the sail is $173 which is lower than the cost of buying them at $ 258.
I would advise The president of Riggs to make the sail by utilizing the excess capacity since its cheaper than purchasing it outside.
I would say C. Hope this helps!
Answer:
Following are the solution to this question:
Explanation:
This method through clicking the "Start" key and select mostly on Software sub-menus, but instead clicking mostly on Accessories submenus of its Programs menu, and afterward the System Tools character sub-menu, select the "System Tools;" then click on the "Tools" key of the "Tools" table to display the actor application.
In Windows 10 you also can access that Character Map by pressing, that Windows icon, then click mostly on Character Chart to view, that Character Map button.
The correct answer is: decrease; $195; $190; $165.
A study found the noise from rock concerts to be harmful.
To correct the externality created by the concerts, the government imposes a tax $30 on sale of each unit.
The price of tickets was initially $190.
After the imposition of the corrective tax, the price increased to $195.
This increase in price will cause the demand for tickets to decrease. As a result, the number of concert tickets sold will decrease.
The socially optimal price of the tickets is $195, as this price eliminates externalities.
The private market price is the price which was creating externalities, in this case, it is $190.
We can find the price received by the firms by deducting the tax amount from the new price.
The price received by the firms is
= $195 - $30
= $165
Answer:
Non-Dividend-Paying Stock
i) Calculation of the expected future price:
EVENT PROBABILITY FUTURE PRICE P RETURN R
A 0.18 $180 $32.40
B 0.09 $108 $9.72
C 0.3 $90 $27.00
D 0.25 $81 $20.25
E 0.18 $225 $40.50
Total 1.0 $129.87 $129.87
Future price = the expected returns = $129.87
ii) Calculation of the return in each of the five events:
EVENT PROBABILITY FUTURE PRICE P RETURN R
A 0.18 $180 $32.40
B 0.09 $108 $9.72
C 0.3 $90 $27.00
D 0.25 $81 $20.25
E 0.18 $225 $40.50
iii) Calculation of the expected return:
EVENT PROBABILITY FUTURE PRICE P RETURN R
A 0.18 $180 $32.40
B 0.09 $108 $9.72
C 0.3 $90 $27.00
D 0.25 $81 $20.25
E 0.18 $225 $40.50
Total 1.0 $129.87
Explanation:
a) Data & Calculations:
EVENT PROBABILITY FUTURE PRICE P RETURN R
A 0.18 $180 ?
B 0.09 $108 ?
C 0.3 $90 ?
D 0.25 $81 ?
E ? $225
If stock A does not pay dividend, it will attract capital appreciation which compensates for the unpaid dividends since the company has increased assets over liabilities. When the assets grow more than the liabilities from the reinvestment of the profits, the net value of the business which is the equity increases. This capital growth belongs to the stockholders and is distributable to them in the form of the future price of the stock, which appreciates with the capital growth.
