Answer:
$2000 was invested at 5% and $5000 was invested at 8%.
Step-by-step explanation:
Assuming the interest is simple interest.
<u>Simple Interest Formula</u>
I = Prt
where:
- I = interest earned.
- P = principal invested.
- r = interest rate (in decimal form).
- t = time (in years).
Given:
- Total P = $7000
- P₁ = principal invested at 5%
- P₂ = principal invested at 8%
- Total interest = $500
- r₁ = 5% = 0.05
- r₂ = 8% = 0.08
- t = 1 year
Create two equations from the given information:
Rewrite Equation 1 to make P₁ the subject:
Substitute this into Equation 2 and solve for P₂:
Substitute the found value of P₂ into Equation 1 and solve for P₁:
$2000 was invested at 5% and $5000 was invested at 8%.
Learn more about simple interest here:
brainly.com/question/27743947
brainly.com/question/28350785
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
refer to the pic above
Answer:
3.5
Step-by-step explanation:
14 - 7 = 7
7/2
3.5
so thats the most hope I helped
It has been proven that of all line segments drawn from a given point not on it, the perpendicular line segment is the shortest.
<h3>How to prove a Line Segment?</h3>
We know that in a triangle if one angle is 90 degrees, then the other angles have to be acute.
Let us take a line l and from point P as shown in the attached file, that is, not on line l, draw two line segments PN and PM. Let PN be perpendicular to line l and PM is drawn at some other angle.
In ΔPNM, ∠N = 90°
∠P + ∠N + ∠M = 180° (Angle sum property of a triangle)
∠P + ∠M = 90°
Clearly, ∠M is an acute angle.
Thus; ∠M < ∠N
PN < PM (The side opposite to the smaller angle is smaller)
Similarly, by drawing different line segments from P to l, it can be proved that PN is smaller in comparison to all of them. Therefore, it can be observed that of all line segments drawn from a given point not on it, the perpendicular line segment is the shortest.
Read more about Line segment at; brainly.com/question/2437195
#SPJ1
