7,1 i think bc if u look at dem patterns
15 I think??(sorry IF YOU GET UT WRONG)
Answer:
$118.43
Step-by-step explanation:
The price on Monday ($126.38), less the decrease ($7.95), results in the price on Tuesday:
$126.38
- 7.95
----------------
$ 118.43
I believe that it would be 17.000000000 (17/20) I do not know if this is right, but I tried haha
Answer:
(c) BC ≅ BC, reflexive property
Step-by-step explanation:
The conclusion of this proof derives from CPCTC and the SAS congruence postulate. In order for SAS to apply, corresponding sides and the angle between them must be shown to be congruent. The congruence statement ...
ΔABC ≅ ΔDCB
tells you these pairs of sides and angles are congruent:
- AB ≅ DC . . . . statement 2
- ∠ABC ≅ ∠DCB . . . . statement 4
- BC ≅ CB . . . . (missing statement 5)
- AC ≅ DB . . . . statement 7
That is, the statement needed to complete the proof is a statement that segment BC is congruent to itself. That congruence is a result of the reflexive property of congruence.
