<span>Which promotion exemplifies the use of a fixed-ratio schedule of reinforcement? A café prints "you are a winner" on a random one-twelfth of its coffee lids; patrons receiving such a lid can redeem it for a free beverage. A fixed-ratio schedule of reinforcement, which a response is reinforced when there is a set number of responses. Every set number of people purchasing the coffee have a chance to win a free beverage. </span>
In today's decentralized business world, TOP MANAGERS are the most important strategic decision makers. Decentralization means distribution of decision making power through the hierarchy of an organization. Decentralization has increases in today's business world as it provides a dynamic environment to work.
Though, in decentralization power is also in hands of lower managers, middle managers, etc the top level managers still hold the rights to make decisions.
Answer:
1. One of your subordinates only seems to respond to threats of punishment. What type of power should you use to motivate him?
h. <u>Persuasive power
</u>
2. You manage a difficult subordinate who only cooperates when she feels that you have the formal authority to ask her to do something. What type of power should you use to motivate her?
b. <u>Legitimate power</u>
3. One of your subordinates looks up to you as a role model. What type of power should you use to motivate her?
a. <u>Personal power</u>
Explanation:
In any given situations there are different incidents that would require someone to apply different power in-order to manage the situation. This could be in form of motivation or deterrent method during the application of the power.
For example, in the case of the subordinate looking up to you as a role model, you should apply personal power in-order to motivate the person. the personal power will help you to build personal relationship between the subordinate and you.
Answer:
The equilibrium number of firms is 20.
Explanation:
Q = SH × b
= 2,400 × (1/20)
= 2,400 × 0.05
= 120
Also given, Q = S / n
120 = 2,400 / n
n = 20
Answer:
There are no options listed, but what I can tell you for sure is that John's actions were both unethical and illegal.
What John did is unethical because it is not moral and it goes against all the principles that guide professional conduct. John also did something illegal because he was an accomplice in committing fraud against the company. He knowingly benefited from the accountant's illegal actions, and that is basically the legal definition of an accomplice to a crime.
