<u>Answer:
</u>
An example of followers using a wider variety of influence tactics than the leader to modify attitudes and behaviors of others would be the arrangement of furniture in the office or the prominently displayed symbols.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The leader, being the one who has the supreme most dignity and the highest status of all, has a conduct of behavior and approach to follow all the time.
- But this is not true with the followers that follow the leader. They can modify their behavior and activities whichever way they want and influence others in order to benefit the leader.
By have an over population of people all over which we would need to make more rules too keep violence under control
A deductive argument is one that the arguer wants to be deductively valid, that really is, to provide a guarantee that the conclusion is correct if the premises are correct.
This principle may alternatively be put as follows: in a deductive argument, the premises are designed to give such strong evidence for the conclusion that, if the premises are true, the conclusion cannot be wrong. A valid (deductively) argument is one in which the premises successfully ensure the conclusion. If a valid argument has true premises, it is also said to be sound. All arguments are either valid or invalid, and either sound or unsound; there is no such thing as being partially valid.
Therefore, the answer is deductive argument.
To know more about deductive argument click here:
brainly.com/question/1803030
#SPJ4
B) Egypt That would be my guess
Answer:
Mesopotamia
Explanation:
This civilization is between two rivers, the Tigris and Euphrates rivers. This is why Mesopotamia is known as the "land between the rivers".
