All categories

3 years ago

Unlike the other groups of people in their region during the Ancient Middle East, the Hebrews were monotheistic, meaning they

2 answers:

8 0

Unlike the different gatherings of people in their country during the Ancient Middle East, the Hebrews were monotheistic, indicating that they believed in only one god which is known as Monotheism.

Further Explanation :

Hebrews shares the ancestry bond with the Samaritans and Jews. They profess to be the Followers of Abraham who is the biblical patriarch. They are recognized for their information into world history because their opinions have turned three principal denominations of the world. They are also acknowledged for their educational , spiritual rules and commands. The Hebrews have changed the community today to a high degree.

Hebrews were wandering people. They existed in the ancient Middle East. Around 1400 BC they established in Canaan, the nation on the easterly coast of Mediterranean sea, which turned to be present-day Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria. Following this, the nation was known as the territory of Israel and, after the demise of King Solomon, was separated into Israel and Judea.

Hebrews were amongst the preeminent people in the world whose doctrine was monotheistic. Monotheism is the idea that there is solely one God. All of their friends were polytheistic.

Learn more:

1. Which is a result of island-hopping? brainly.com/question/8891404

2. When wwii began, which country controlled Korea? brainly.com/question/2390884

3. How were the governments of Japan and Italy similar in the 1930s? check all that apply? brainly.com/question/8975931

Answer Details:

Grade: High school

Subject: History

Topic: Hebrew Culture

Keywords: Hebrews, Israel, Judea, territory, Jordan , monotheism, polytheistic, Canaan, Middle east , eastern coast , Mediterranean, kingdom

Nonamiya [84]3 years ago

7 0

A. believed in only one god... Mono means one; alone; single<span>:</span>

You might be interested in

What is the leading agricultural region of Georgia a coastal plain b Appalachian plateau c blue Ridge d ridge and valley

denpristay [2]

Answer: A. Coastal Plain

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Why might the Allies have allowed the Soviet Union to join them when they knew full well about Stalin's tactics

SIZIF [17.4K]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.

Allies allowed the Soviet Union to join them when they knew full well about Stalin's tactics because Great Britain and France really knew that they alone, could not stop Hitler's troops from invading France and then the British territory.

Winston Churchill and Charles De Gaulle knew that although Joseph Stalin was a tyrant and a dictator, he ruled over a great land with supplies and had the kind of strong men in its army that could be of great help to contain the Germans.

That is how, the three allies with the help of the United States army, could devise a plan to retake North Africa to invade through Italy (the Axis troops had occupied North Africa), invade France from Britain and Germany from the Soviet Union. Once done that, the United States Navy with the help of the Allies could attack and defeat Japan in the Pacific.

3 0

3 years ago

The goal of the pendleton act and the hatch act was to:

ivolga24 [154]

The answer is Reduce political influence over federal government employees

I hope that helped

6 0

3 years ago

Certain politicians asserted that African Americans

Ratling [72]

The significance of the 54th Massachusetts regiment was that it was the first African-American regiment to play a major role in a military campaign.

<h3>What is the 54th Massachusetts regiment?</h3>

During the American Civil War, this infantry regiment saw an extensive service in the Union Army which included the African-American.

Therefore, the infantry regiment was significant because it was an all black regiment of troops during the Civil War.

Read more about 54th Massachusetts regiment

<em>brainly.com/question/495194</em>

#SPJ1

4 0

1 year ago

Drag each tile to the correct location.

valentina_108 [34]

Answer:

1- McCulloch v. Maryland:

-The Second Bank of the United States was involved in the case.

-The Supreme Court ruled that a state could not tax a federal institution

2- Gibbons v. Ogden:

-The state of New York was involved in the case.

-The Supreme Court ruled that a state could not regulate commercial activities between states.

-A state-granted one company exclusive rights over the Hudson river.

Explanation:

1- McCulloch v. Maryland was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1819, in which the state of Maryland was barred from levying a tax on federal banks operating in its territory. As a result, the principle of federalism triumphed over state rights, while the constitutional "Necessary and Proper Clause," which allows Congress to carry out certain actions not expressly stated in the Constitution but that appear to conform with those permitted activities, remained in effect.

2- Gibbons v. Ogden was a Supreme Court decision from 1824 that upheld the federal government's authority to control interstate trade. This is due to a dispute between New York and New Jersey, which was supposed to be settled by municipal courts but ended up breaching the Supreme Court's original authority and the states' right to equality.

4 0

2 years ago