Answer:
The anwer is core knowledge.
Explanation:
The core knowledge perspective questions whether some of the human capacities are present from birth or developed over time. One of its goals is to compare human abilities with those of other animals.
Humans have been studied to possess the core knowledge of acquiring language. Other animals, such as te Monarch butterfly, seem to find their way to the south using an "internal compass".
I know this for 100% it is A. they're convenient , I know this one for sure 100% positive hope it helps
<u>Answer:</u>
"The poor depended on grains to survive while the wealthy enjoyed game and other exotic dishes" is the best comparison for the food available to the poor versus that which the wealthy enjoyed.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The difference of food consumed by rich and poor depends upon the specific countries but two assumptions are common among all nations that rich consume their food in more pieces and in more fancy manner than poor. Here if we discuss Romans than following could be understood:
- On an average the Rich Romans ate three meals, first meal/breakfast was called the "ientaculum". It was usually eaten around dawn, involve bread and perhaps some fruit.
- The lunch meal was called the "prandium" it was a very small meal, consumed at about 11 AM.
- The "cena" was the major meal of the day it was consumed in the afternoon.
- A porridge name, "puls," was the staple food of the poor. Puls was made by combining ground wheat and water. They might sometimes get some vegetables or fruits to consume with their pulses. Meat was consumed very rarely by them.
<span>Mendel demonstrated the particulate hypothesis Quantitatively followed traits through multiple generations
Showed reappearance of hidden traits in expected proportions
Genes are discrete heritable units
Remain separate in offspring
Separate physical units pieces of meat
Combinations give variation</span>