The statement, investor perception on the risk of bonds will raise their desired return is true.
The higher an investment's risk, the greater its potential returns should be. By contrast, a very safe and low-risk investment should generally offer low returns. So, this investor perception will raise the desired return of the risk of bonds.
Generally, the higher the potential return of an investment, the higher the risk. Thus, there is no guarantee that you will actually get a higher return by accepting more risk. In this matter diversification is useful.
Hence, you can minimize the risk by making sure the company's bond you own is not a high risk company with a high probability of paying back.
To learn more about risk of bonds here:
brainly.com/question/14850768
#SPJ4
Answer:
The store manager must decide to buy 3
Explanation:
Given that:
- The first: $200 a year
- The second $150
- The third $75,
- The fourth $50
- Interest rate is 12 percent
- Investment: $500
As we know that the rate of return will be: Income / Investment
So the rate of return of:
- The first: $200 / $500 = 0.4 = 40%
- The second $150 / $500 = 0,3 = 30%
- The third $75 / $500 = 0.15 = 15%
- The fourth $50 / $500 = 0.1 = 10%
Only three rug cleaners have the rate of return greater than the interest rate so the store manager must decide to buy 3
Answer:
Crash the schedule.
Explanation:
Fast-track can complete the task earlier but takes more money. Assign more experienced people will cost the management more money. Cut scope reduces the project requirement and finishes the task earlier. Therefore, options A B and D can not be the answer.
Crash the schedule (option C) is the answer because it allocates enough resources to complete the task earlier without spending more money.
The words are
transparent,involved,and empathetic
Answer:
Supply side is the view point of the Firms or the Businesses.
Explanation:
As the law of demand deals with the consumers side, the law of supply deals with the suppliers or the firms/businesses.
this tries to explain the factors that affect the supply, such as the prices of the substitutes and complements, the price of a commodity itself, taxes, government subsidies, technological influences, etc...
in this question, the 1st option, consumer is wrong. However, in certain situations, Government can be acted as a "supplier" (if there is a government monopoly on the supply of a good or a service", and government is a heavy influencer of supply through the implementaion of taxes and subsidies!
