Answer: The correct answer is B. Yes, because the State B driver's claim is a proper cross-claim and is within the court's supplemental jurisdiction.
Explanation:
Option B is correct because the State B driver can assert his tort claim against the State B manufacturer. The driver's claim is a proper crossclaim and this is because it arises from the same occurrence as with State A consumer's claim.
Answer:
The price of the bond is closest $101.36
Explanation:
It is noteworthy that a rational investor pays for a bond today the cash flows derivable from the bonds in future discounted to today's terms.
The future cash flows comprise of the yearly coupon interest of $5.5(5.5% *$100) for 3 years as well as the repayment of the principal $100 at the end of year 3.
To bring the cash inflows today's term, we multiply them them by the discounting factor 1/(1+r)^N , where is the yield to maturity of 5% and N is the relevant the cash flow is received.
The discounting is done in attached spreadsheet leading $ 101.36 present value today.
Answer:
c. 32.99%
Explanation:
Risk yield = bond yield*(1 - Federal tax rate)
6.50% = 9.70%*(1 - Federal tax rate)
1 - Federal tax rate = 6.50%/9.70%
Federal tax rate = 1 - 6.50%/9.70%
= 32.99%
Therefore, The federal tax rate that you are indifferent between the two bonds is 32.99%
Explanation:
Is the answer C if not please explain
Answer:
d) All of above
Explanation:
A partnership agreement provides guidelines on how two or more partners will manage their partnership business. It is the contract that dictates each partner's roles, profit and loss sharing formula, and personal liability of each in case of insolvency.
In the absence of a partnership agreement, the law prescribes that partners share profits and losses equally. All partners assume equal rights to responsibilities and liabilities.