1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
WINSTONCH [101]
3 years ago
13

Source: John L. O'Sullivan, "Annexation, The United States Magazine and Democratic Review, Vol.

History
1 answer:
Aleks [24]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Find the explanation below.

Explanation:

1. The central idea of this text is that the United States was justified in annexing Texas. The author supports this in his statement, "Imbecile and distracted, Mexico never can exert any real governmental authority over  such a country." The writer here means that only the United States had the true rights to rule over Texas.

2. Yes, according to this document, the United States was right in going into war with Mexico. The speaker in the text strongly justifies the annexation of Texas by the United States because he believes that a country like Mexico lacked what it took to preside over Texas. He also believed that it was the manifest destiny of the United States approved by God for them to expand their territory to accommodate their growing population.

You might be interested in
How did shang kings maintain their power?
AleksandrR [38]
The only answer I found was: The ancient Chinese kings maintained control of their dynasties throguh military means.

You probably go to connections accademy. I do too.

This question is in the Journey Across Time text book on page 231. The answer is on pages 225 - 231.

Besides the two answers above me, I managed to find a reasonable answer:

"Rulers became powerful because they controlled land and had strong armies."

This is all I could find, hope this benefits others who wonder what the answer is!
6 0
3 years ago
In the early 1800s, society considered temperance to be an acceptable cause for female reformers because this issue related to
dlinn [17]

Answer:

a woman's ability to provide for her family.

Explanation:

That is correct

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which document outlined principles that formed the basis of the English Bill of Rights?
9966 [12]

Answer: The answer is C. Act of Supremacy

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is not a way in which archaeologists have learned about the first Americans?
egoroff_w [7]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

because they did a DNA analysis and uncovering of artifacts

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why were those trains allowed to roll unhindered into Poland? Why were the tracks leading to Birkenau never bombed? I have put t
anyanavicka [17]

Answer:

Historically, the primary reason the lines leading to Birkenau were never attacked was due to a lack of political resolve to do so, and not because bombing operations were unimportant. When the gas chambers were operational in 1941, the majority of the concentration camps were located out from the range of Allied bombers and German air defenses.

The Allied Forces knew about the detention camps by June 1944, and the German air defenses were on the decline. Bomber efficiency is improving. The railroads were still intact. Every day, thousands of Jewish are processed in these centers.

Historians agree that the Nazis would still murder the Jews even without the concentration camps. The mobile death squads were among the most prolific extermination organizations of the Nazis. Even though the bombs wouldn't halt the murders, the Allied focused on the bombings of military camps and industrial areas in order to undermine Germany's war operations.

Explanation:

Railways were an important component of the Holocaust and Nazi activities. Information on the camps was only accessible after the war had ended. They felt that the costs would exceed the advantages of bombing the railroads. Millions of Jews had already been gassed.

Had the Allied Forces simply bombed the railroads once they had the intelligence, many lives might have been spared. They only needed political will and a commitment to social duty, regardless of the personal dangers, in order to put a stop to the camps' deadly activities.

Soviet forces were the major Allied soldiers in the Eastern Front, where they committed genocide of their own people. Stalin also has anti-Semitic inclinations. We may be certain that he didn't bomb the railroads and let the Germans continue to use the extermination camps.

Hope this helps, if so would you mind saying thanks?

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was the purpose of the Economic Opportunity Act
    15·1 answer
  • What documents were written to persuade people to adopt the new constitution?
    7·1 answer
  • >>>I GAVE ALL MY POINTS! 99! PLEASE! PLEASE HELP! WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!<<<
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements best describes the relationship between colonization and slavery in the centuries following th
    12·2 answers
  • The Northern Renaissance is MOST associated with
    6·2 answers
  • Use the two maps below to answer the following question:
    7·2 answers
  • What is the legacy of wwi
    15·2 answers
  • But in the West today, we see a free world that has achieved a level of prosperity and well-being unprecedented in all human his
    11·2 answers
  • How was the education provided for new england colonies, middle colonies, and southern colonies
    5·1 answer
  • Who was the first to sign the declaration of independence?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!