Babe if ur reading this I am dead bc it took me a lifetime to read this now if you excuse me I have to start from the top again bc I lost my place bc it’s so much words
A hospital whose departmental and shift teams share information and expectations about work is an example of high media richness.
<h3 /><h3>What is media wealth theory?</h3>
It is a way of classifying and structurally evaluating the wealth of media used in the work environment. The theory states that the greater the ability of a medium to convey a complex message effectively, the richer it will be.
Therefore, high media richness is related to reducing ambiguity in a communication, conveying a message more quickly and effectively.
Find out more about media wealth theory here:
brainly.com/question/5608221
Answer:
a. $392, 265
Explanation:
Given that:
i. Purchasing department, overhead allocation rate is $77 per purchase order.
ii. Assembly department, overhead allocation rate is $5 per part.
iii. Packaging department, overhead allocation rate is $4 per unit.
iv. Direct material cost is $70 per unit.
v. Each stereo has 50 parts.
Total parts required = 1200 x 50
= 60000
vi. 45 purchase order was required for 1200 stereos.
Thus:
i. $77 x 45 = $3465
ii. $5 x 60000 = $300000
iii. $4 x 1200 = $4800
iv. $70 x 1200 = $84000
Therefore,
total cost for 1200 stereos = $3465 + $300000 + $4800 + $84000
= $392, 265
Answer:
<u>Mistake of ignoring secondary effects</u>
Explanation:
Whenever there arises an adverse impact of a policy and it's implementation, owing to ignorance of secondary consequences, it is termed as ignoring secondary effects.
In short, it refers to assessing and viewing only the positive aspects of a policy or a move, meanwhile not taking into consideration the other adverse consequences which are also associated with the same policy.
In the given case, the environmentalists have only considered the generation of alternative sources of energy via windmills which will lead to preservation of fossil fuels. The proposed policy has been implemented without taking into account it's flip side i.e the harm it causes to bat population and migratory birds.
Thus, it can be stated that the environmentalists herein only considered the favorable outcome of a policy implementation and ignored the adverse effect of the same. Hence, they are said to have committed the mistake of ignoring the secondary effects.
