Answer:
B) There is NOT sufficient evidence to conclude the proportion of work time linguists study a new language is more than 10%.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
the null hypothesis is;
![H_o : p =0.10](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=H_o%20%3A%20p%20%3D0.10)
the alternative hypothesis is:
![H_a : p >0.10](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=H_a%20%3A%20p%20%3E0.10)
The p - value for the hypothesis is 0.09
The level of significance ∝ = 0.025
The Decision rule is that to reject the null hypothesis if the p-value is less than the level of significance ∝.
Conclusion: We fail to reject the null hypothesis because the p-value is greater than the level of significance , therefore:
There is NOT sufficient evidence to conclude the proportion of work time linguists study a new language is more than 10%.
Answer:
4 + 10i
Step-by-step explanation:
Expanding the bracket we have;
(7+3i)-(3-7i) = 7+3i-3+7i
(7+3i)-(3-7i) = 7+3i-3+7i = 7-3 + 3i + 7i= 4 + 10i
Answer:
x= 9
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
3m-5
Step-by-step explanation:
combine like terms
Answer: The Answer is (4,-6)
Step-by-step explanation: