Answer:
BA = 25π,
LA = 25√2π,
TA = 25π + 25√2π,
V = 41 and 2 / 3π
Step-by-step explanation:
We need to determine the height here, as it is not given, and is quite important to us. The height is a perpendicular line segment to the radius, hence forming a 45 - 45 - 90 degree triangle as you can see. Therefore, by " Converse to Base Angles Theorem " the height should be equal in length to the radius,
( Height = 5 inches = Radius
______
Now knowing the height, let's begin by calculating the base area. By it's name, we have to find the area of the base. As it is a circle, let us apply the formula " πr^2 "
- Base Area = 25π
______
The lateral area is simply the surface area excluding the base area, the surface area having a formula of " πr^2 + πrl. " Thus, the lateral area can be calculated through the formula " πrl, " but as we are not given the slant height ( l ) we have to use another formula,
-
- Lateral Area = 25√2π
______
And the surface area is the base area + lateral area -
- Surface Area
______
The volume of a cone is 1 / 3rd that of a cylinder, with a simple formula of Base * height. Therefore, we can conclude the following -
- Volume = 41 and 2 / 3π
A.450 If the balance of supplies at the start of the month was $900 then at the end of the month it was $450 so the answer would be 450.
Got this answer on weegy you should check it out sometimes
Answer:
The p value would be given by:
For this case since th p value is lower than the significance level of0.05 we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean for this case is significantly different from 46.7 MPG
Step-by-step explanation:
Information given
represent the mean
represent the population standard deviation
sample size
represent the value to verify
represent the significance level for the hypothesis test.
z would represent the statistic
represent the p value
Hypothesis to test
We want to test if the true mean for this case is 46.7, the system of hypothesis would be:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
Since we know the population deviation the statistic is given by:
(1)
Replacing we got:
The p value would be given by:
For this case since th p value is lower than the significance level of0.05 we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean for this case is significantly different from 46.7 MPG