2. Combine lead (II) nitrate and potassium iodide solutions. Pb(NO3)2+ Kl →

rusak2 [61]

Yes that is correct because hypotheses should be testable meaning it can be proven wrong and it has to be reasonable meaning it should make sense.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Be sure to answer all parts. Dimercaprol (HSCH2CHSHCH2OH) was developed during World War I as an antidote to arsenic-based poiso

Sauron [17]

Answer:

For A: The number of arsenic atoms are $3.4\times 10^{21}$

For B: The percent composition of mercury, thallium and chromium in their complexes are 61.76 %, 62.2 % and 29.51 % respectively.

Explanation:

For A:

To calculate the number of moles, we use the equation:

$\text{Number of moles}=\frac{\text{Given mass}}{\text{Molar mass}}$

Given mass of dimercaprol = 696 mg = 0.696 g (Conversion factor: 1 g = 1000 mg)

Molar mass of dimercaprol = 124.21 g/mol

Putting values in above equation, we get:

$\text{Moles of dimercaprol}=\frac{0.696g}{124.21g/mol}=0.0056mol$

According to mole concept:

1 mole of a compound contains $6.022\times 10^{23}$ number of molecules.

So, 0.0056 moles of dimercaprol will contain $0.0056\times 6.022\times 10^{23}=3.4\times 10^{21}$ number of molecules.

As, 1 molecule of dimercaprol binds with 1 atom of Arsenic

So, $3.4\times 10^{21}$ number of dimercaprol molecules will bind with = $1\times 3.4\times 10^{21}=3.4\times 10^{21}$ number of arsenic atoms

Hence, the number of arsenic atoms are $3.4\times 10^{21}$

For B:

We know that:

Molar mass of dimercaprol = 124.21 g/mol

Molar mass of mercury = 200.59 g/mol

Molar mass of thallium = 204.38 g/mol

Molar mass of chromium = 51.99 g/mol

Also, 1 molecule of dimercaprol binds with 1 metal atom.

To calculate the percentage composition of metal in a complex, we use the equation:

$\%\text{ composition of metal}=\frac{\text{Mass of metal}}{\text{Mass of complex}}\times 100$ ......(1)

For mercury:

Mass of Hg-complex = (200.59 + 124.21) = 324.8 g

Mass of mercury = 200.59 g

Putting values in equation 1, we get:

$\%\text{ composition of mercury}=\frac{200.59g}{324.8g}\times 100=61.76\%$

For thallium:

Mass of Tl-complex = (204.38 + 124.21) = 328.59 g

Mass of thallium = 204.38 g

Putting values in equation 1, we get:

$\%\text{ composition of thallium}=\frac{204.38g}{328.59g}\times 100=62.2\%$

For chromium:

Mass of Cr-complex = (51.99 + 124.21) = 176.2 g

Mass of chromium = 51.99 g

Putting values in equation 1, we get:

$\%\text{ composition of chromium}=\frac{51.99g}{176.2g}\times 100=29.51\%$

Hence, the percent composition of mercury, thallium and chromium in their complexes are 61.76 %, 62.2 % and 29.51 % respectively.

8 0

3 years ago

The overlapping of food chains results in a

Katyanochek1 [597]

Answer:

.

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

Based on the information in the table, which of the following arranges the bonds in order of decreasing

tatuchka [14]

Answer:

what grade so i can help

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The standard cell potential of the following galvanic cell is 1.562 V at 298 K. Zn(s) | Zn2+(aq) || Ag+(aq) | Ag(s) What is the

myrzilka [38]

Answer:

E = 1.602v

Explanation:

Use the Nernst Equation => E(non-std) = E⁰(std) – (0.0592/n)logQc …

Zn⁰(s) => Zn⁺²(aq) + 2 eˉ

2Ag⁺(aq) + 2eˉ=> 2Ag⁰(s)

_____________________________

Zn⁰(s) + 2Ag⁺(aq) => Zn⁺²(aq) + 2Ag(s)

Given E⁰ = 1.562v

Qc = [Zn⁺²(aq)]/[Ag⁺]² = (1 x 10ˉ³)/(0.150)² = 0.044

E = E⁰ -(0.0592/n)logQc = 1.562v – (0.0592/2)log(0.044) = 1.602v

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers