Answer:
Response 1
Step-by-step explanation:
Response 1 is the only wording that is self-consistent. Response 1 is the appropriate response.
___
Response 2 argues about angles, then concludes sides are congruent. This makes no sense.
Response 3 identifies congruent segments, but they are not opposite sides. The conclusion is unsupported.
Answer:
I do not understand.
Step-by-step explanation:
Please add a picture of explain what it is you want help with.
At this moment I do not understand the question, I am sorry.
Answer:
1,2,3
Step-by-step explanation:
The emissions per capita measurement is a better because it shows the number of people divided by the emissions.
<h3>What is the difference between total emissions and emissions per capita?</h3>
The emissions per capita show the emissions per each citizen or inhabitant, while the total emissions show only the emissions of the country.
<h3>Which one is better?</h3>
The per capita gauge is better because whether a country is polluting more or not depends on how much each citizen pollutes. This information is useful to create laws that reduce pollution.
Learn more about pollution in: brainly.com/question/23857736
#SPJ1
