Answer:
Sigma factors bind to the promoter region of a particular gene and facilitating the binding of RNA Polymerase to the promoter region (formation of the RNA polymerase holoenzyme complex) in order initiate transcription of the gene.
Put simply - Helps RNA Polymerase do it's job.
<span>Ni = 5
The Rydberg formula for hydrogen is
1/w = R(1/a^2 - 1/b^2)
where
w = wavelength in vacuum
R = Rydberg constant 1.0973731568508x10^7 1/m
a,b = integers greater than or equal to 1 and a < b
Now we need to select the value for a.
a = 1 will converge towards 91.13 nm
a = 2 converges towards 364.51 nm
a = 3 converges towards 820.14 nm
...
Because of this, we will assume a = 1 for this problem since it converges closest to the wavelength given.
Substitute known values
1/w = R(1/a^2 - 1/b^2)
1/9.504x10^-8 = 1.0973731568508x10^7(1/1^2 - 1/b^2)
10521885.52 = 1.0973731568508x10^7(1/1 - 1/b^2)
0.958824759 = 1 - 1/b^2
-0.041175241 = -1/b^2
0.041175241 = 1/b^2
24.28643927 = b^2
4.928127359 = b
So Ni = 5.</span>
Energy convention: Convection is the motion of a fluid driven by temperature differences across that fluid. When a fluid is heated, the region in closest contact with the heat source becomes less dense due to increased kinetic energy in the particles. Convection is one of the fundamental ways that heat is transferred
Answer:
If the transgenic salmon escapes from their pens into the ocean population there are chances that they would compete with the wild salmons for food and space. They may also bring new diseases and changes to the food webs and ecosystem of the ocean.
Explanation:
A transgenic organism or genetically modified organism is the one that undergoes alternation through recombinant DNA technology.
No, I do not think that FDA should approve Aquabounty of growing and selling transgenic salmon since there is higher chance that they may interfere and disturb with the ecosystem and might also bring new diseases.
Hey there!
A Burrowing owl's habitat is destroyed which is due to human activities and will come under Artificial destruction via human influence and not due to a natural destruction like cyclones, High Richter scale earthquakes, hurricanes with extremely high knot speeds, etc. Instead I'll say because of which the population of the burrowing owl will obviously decrease because they're more adapted to "their previous environment" and most likely "wouldn't adapt to a new unfamiliar environment".
To break these contradictions down simply said "they're unaware of the rules, regulations, type of soil, type of trophic levels, number of predatory organisms, etc. this makes it pretty hard to move from their once said naturally provided nature-made habitat to the burrowing owl, which got lost due to habitat annihilation by human cause. Further making the owls to adapt and change their "NATURAL TRAITS" to make it "CUSTOM" because of which these aren't going to help them instead they'd go either extinct by moving to a newly known unfamiliar habitat rather than their naturally nature gifted habitation.
So Yeah, the correct option [after the question mark ends] to be the least likely outcome would've been "the population of species of burrowing owl maybe increase as per arriving in a new habitat or introduced to newly made surroundings". This is "Highly and the most unlikely" or the "least likely predictable outcome" for burrowing owls. Introduction of species to newer habitats without any prior training, kills the species and it's progenies.
Hope this helps you and gives you the detailed analysis for this query for burrowing owls!!!!
