1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stiks02 [169]
2 years ago
10

What is this? Please answer if u know what u are doing

Mathematics
1 answer:
Katen [24]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

(2, 20 )

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

y = 5 × 2^{x} ← substitute x = 2

y = 5 × 2² = 5 × 4 = 20

Then (2, 20 )

You might be interested in
the distance between california and mexico border is 100 miles less than thrice the distance between california and washington.
harina [27]

Answer: B. 3m-100

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
1 year ago
Maximize the objective function P = 2x + 1.5y for the feasible region shown. State the maximum value for P and the ordered pair
umka2103 [35]

Incomplete question. However, let's assume this are feasible regions to consider:

Points:

- (0, 100)

- (0, 125)

- (0, 325)

- (1, 200)

Answer:

<u>Maximum value occurs at 325 at the point (0, 325)</u>

<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>

Remember, we substitute the points value for x, y in the objective function P = 2x + 1.5y.

- For point (0, 100): P= 2(0) + 1.5 (100) =150

- For point (0, 125): P= 2(0) + 1.5 (125) =187.5

For point (0, 325): P= 2(0) + 1.5 (325) = 487.5

For point (1, 200): P= 2(1) + 1.5 (200) = 302

Therefore, we could notice from the above solutions that at point (0,325) we attain the maximum value of P.

7 0
2 years ago
Which of the following statement best describes the effect of replacing the graph of f(x) with the graph of f(x) - 3?
Dafna11 [192]
To move a graph up c units, add c to the whole function

so basicaly what you did is you subtraced 3 from the whole function

the whole graph shifts 3 units down

B is answer
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which number is a prime number?<br><br> 63<br> 65<br> 67<br> 69
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]
67 is a prime number
8 0
2 years ago
. In a study of air-bag effectiveness it was found that in 821 crashes of midsize cars equipped with air bags, 46 of the crashes
jok3333 [9.3K]

Answer:

P(X ≤ 46 | X~B(821, 0.078)) = 0.00885745584

0.00885... < 0.01

The test statistic of 46 is significant

There is sufficient evidence to reject H₀ and accept H₁

Air bags are more effective as protection than safety belts

Step-by-step explanation:

821 crashes

46 hospitalisations where car has air bags

7.8% or 0.078 probability of hospitalisations in cars with automatic safety belts

α = 0.01 or 1% ← level of significance

One-tailed test

We are testing whether hospitalisations in cars with air bags are less likely than in a car with automatic safety belts;

The likelihood of hospitalisation in a car with automatic safety belts, we are told, is 7.8% or 0.078;

So we are testing if hospitalisations in cars with air bags is less than 0.078;

So, firstly:

Let X be the continuous random variable, the number of hospitalisations from a car crash with equipped air bags

X~B(821, 0.078)

Null hypothesis (H₀): p = 0.078

Alternative hypothesis (H₁): p < 0.078

According to the information, we reject H₀ if:

P(X ≤ 46 | X~B(821, 0.078)) < 0.01

To find P(X ≤ 46) or equally P(X < 47), it could be quite long-winded to do manually for this particular scenario;

If you are interested, the manual process involves using the formula for every value of x up to and including 46, i.e. x = 0, x = 1, x = 2, etc. until x = 46, the formula is:

P(X = r) = nCr * p^{r}  * (1 - p)^{n - r}

You can find binomial distribution calculators online, where you input n (i.e. the number of trials or 821 in this case), probability (i.e. 0.078) and the test statistic (i.e. 46), it does it all for you, which gives:

P(X ≤ 46 | X~B(821, 0.078)) = 0.00885745584

Now, we need to consider if the condition for rejecting H₀ is met and recognise that:

0.00885... < 0.01

There is sufficient evidence to reject H₀ and accept H₁.

To explain what this means:

The test statistic of 46 is significant according to the 1% significance level, meaning the likelihood that only 46 hospitalisations are seen in car crashes with air bags in the car as compared to the expected number in car crashes with automatic safety belts is very unlikely, less than 1%, to be simply down to chance;

In other words, there is 99%+ probability that the lower number of hospitalisations in car crashes with air bags is due to some reason, such as air bags being more effective as a protective implement than the safety belts in car crashes.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Garret hiked 14 miles in 4 hours. Elena hiked 21 miles in 6 hours. Do these rates demonstrate a proportional relationship? Why o
    8·1 answer
  • Milton mixed 1/2 gallons of red paint , 2/5 gallons of blue paint, 1 2/3 gallons of orange paint into a mixing barrel. How many
    12·1 answer
  • 2 Points<br> What can you say about the end behavior of the function f(x)=-4x + 6x2 - 52?
    6·1 answer
  • Kennedy inaugural argument for the government helping the poor in the country? ​
    15·1 answer
  • I wrote this for math class, does it make sense?A very famous equation, Euler’s identity relates the seemingly random values of
    12·1 answer
  • If David had $10. He shared $3 with Steve, $6 with Anderson. How much money does he have left?
    8·1 answer
  • What is the angle measure of a each interior angle of a regular decagon
    13·1 answer
  • H&amp;M was having a huge sale last weekend. Steven bought 2 sweatshirts for $20.00 each. When he got to the register the cashie
    15·2 answers
  • There were 407 boys and 438 girls who like to join the Independence Day parade. How many buses will be hired if 65 persons can b
    7·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!!
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!