<span>I agree with you, I believe the answer is Iroquois.</span>
The Iroquois (or Haudenosaunee meaning “People of
the Longhouse”) are powerful northeast Native American confederacy, which have
through history fallowed matriarchal system. They believed that God appointed
women as stewards of the land. Women had higher regard in Iroquois clan as they
have raised children, they held property and hereditary leadership was passing
through their lines. The best representation of the higher status of women in Iroquois
clan was through figure of Clan Mother who appointed leaders and had the right
to strip them of their leadership.
Modern foragers are not Stone Age relics, living fossils, lost tribes, or noble savages. Still, to the extent that foraging has been the basis of their subsistence, contemporary and recent hunter-gatherers can illustrate links between foraging economies and other aspects of society and culture, such as their sociopolitical organization.
Answer: Option C
<u>Explanation:</u>
In the history of human beings on this planet, hunters-gatherers hold the longest history. Even today there are many societies where people rely on foraging for their sustenance and survival and have not adapted to the modern ways of civilised societies.
These modern foragers do not stuck in time and living the life of early man but they have developed well organised social and political structure for themselves. They possess their own culture and rituals to follow and their tribe issues are decided by the well-established political system.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Well you have to do it got no other choice
Answer:
Convenience sampling
Explanation:
In convenience sampling, the samples for the research is drawn from the population that is very easily accessible by the researchers rather than using a specific criteria.
From the description above we can see that the internet site use only its members as the samples. Since the data of the site's members is easily accessible for the site, we can consider it as convenience sampling.
Answer:
B) negatively correlated.
Explanation:
The case is set, would reflect a negative correlation between wealth and marital satisfaction.
This means that not necessarily the wealth would cause marriages to report higher levels of happiness or satisfaction. This would imply that there is an inverse relationship between two variables - when one variable decreases, the other increases. So to the contrary, it would mean the opposite. Having less money would favor marital satisfaction.
It is so believed that money issues are important variables so, they should be reconsidered. In the case as stated having more money turns into less satisfaction of the pair.
A example that is similar to this as a negative correlation, is the birth of children, and mariage, since the condition creates stress that the new creature poses to the relationship between the pair, that was often better treated.
