Answer:
distance travelled by sprinter = 100 m
Time taken = 11.21sec
∵speed = distance/time taken
= 100/9.83
= 10.17 m/s
Now we know, 1 km/h = 1000/3600 m/s
so, 1 m/s = 3600/1000 km/h = 18/5 km/h
∴ 10.17 m/s = 10.17 × 18/5 = 10.17 × 18/5 = 36.612 km/h
Hence, average speed = 36.612 km/h
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
x = -12
Step-by-step explanation:
Set logs up on both sides-
log 16^x = log 64^x+4
The variable goes behind because of the exponent log <em>property</em> (exponents are permitted to go behind the log to multiply)-
x * log 16 = x + 4 * log 64
Divide both logs out-
log 64/log 16 = 1.5
Simplify-
x = x+4(1.5)
1.5x + 6 = x
Remove 1.5-
1 - 1.5 = -.5x
Simplify-
-.5x = 6
Divide both sides-
6/-.5x = -12
Hence, the answer would be -12
Answer:
a. 48
b. You need 6 packs of cups and 8 packs of plates
c. 72 is another one she would need 9 packs of cups and 12 packs of plates to get this one
Answer:
6√z
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>
Answer: Choice B</h3>
No, this is not a plausible value for the population mean, because 5 is not within the 95% confidence interval.
====================================================
Explanation:
The greek letter mu is the population mean. It has the symbol which looks like the letter 'u' but with a tail at the front or left side.
The question is asking if mu = 5 is plausible if the researcher found the 95% confidence interval to be 5.2 < mu < 7.8
We see that 5 is <u>not</u> in that interval. It's a bit to the left of 5.2
Since mu = 5 is not in the interval, it's not a plausible value for the population mean.
Have we ruled it out with 100% confidence? No. Such a thing is not possible. There's always room for (slight) error. The researcher would need to do a census to be fully confident; however, such practices are very time consuming and expensive. This is the main reason why statistics is important to try to estimate the population with a sample.