Answer:
they had oxs and horeses to help them travel
Explanation:
The most widely well-known definition of applied behavior analysis as defined by Baer, Wolf “the procedure of systematically applying interventions primarily based upon the concepts of gaining knowledge of theory to improve socially significant behaviors to a meaningful diploma, and to demonstrate that the interventions hired .
These seven characteristics include: applied, behavioral, analytic, conceptual, technological, effective, and generalizable. When using ABA, one incorporates these components within a process to teach and evaluate effects of the approach.
Implemented conduct analysis might also resource basic researchers within the design of externally legitimate experiments and thereby decorate the theoretical significance of simple research for understanding human conduct.
Learn more about behavior analysis here:brainly.com/question/11449763
#SPJ4
Arguments that appear to be legitimate but are really founded on poor reasoning are known as logical fallacies. They could be the product of unintentional thinking mistakes or purposely employed to deceive others.
Taking logical fallacies at its value might cause to base our conclusions on weak arguments and result in poor decisions. Some of the text relies on the effectiveness of logical fallacies are :
- The Bandwagon Fallacy: Bandwagon fallacies, such as "three out of four individuals think X brand toothpaste cleans teeth best," are something that most of us expect to see in advertising; nonetheless, this fallacy may easily find its way into regular meetings and conversations.
- The Appeal to Authority Fallacy: Having an authoritative person support your claim might be a strong supplement to an existing argument, but it cannot be the main tenet of your case. Something is not always real just because a powerful person thinks it to be true.
- The False Dilemma Fallacy: The false dilemma fallacy claims that there are only two possible endings, which are mutually incompatible, rather than understanding that most (if not all) topics may be conceived of on a spectrum of options and perspectives.
- The Hasty Generalization Fallacy: This mistake happens when someone makes broad assumptions based on insufficient data. In other words, they ignore plausible counterarguments and make assumptions about the truth of a claim that has some, but insufficient, supporting evidence.
- The Slothful Induction Fallacy: This fallacy happens when there is enough logical evidence to conclude something is true, but someone refuses to admit it, instead attributing the result to coincidence or something completely unrelated.
- The Correlation Fallacy: If two things seem to be linked, it doesn't always follow that one of them caused the other indisputablelly. Even while it can seem like a straightforward fallacy to recognise, it can be difficult to do so in actual practise, especially if you truly want to uncover a link between two pieces of information to support your claim.
To learn more logical fallacies refer
brainly.com/question/18094137
#SPJ4
Answer:
Explanation:The answer is D. It is not respected, as rulers violate laws as they please. This is how rule of law is regarded in a dictatorship. It is a form of government which one person has absolute power. In dictatorship government in which the will of the state is regarded as above the will of every people it governs.
