2867.5 is bigger
Even though they both show 5 numbers, the second one has only one decimal place versus 2 on the first
If you ignore the decimal, your left with
290 vs 2867
2867 is much bigger than 290 so this is the answer
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Since there's no one one number you can add to one number in the sequence to get to the next number, this is not arithmetic. It must be geometric. We need then to find the common ratio. Let's start with the first 2 numbers, find a ratio, and then use it to test for accuracy.
10x = 15 and
x = 
If this is in fact a geometric sequence witha common ratio of 3/2, we should be able to multiply 15 by 3/2 to get to the next number in the sequence. Let's try it out:
Good. So the common ratio is 3/2. The formula for an explicit geometric formula is
where a1 is the first number in the sequence and r is the common ratio. Filling in:
Answer:
The discovery of new resources can cause the LRAS curve to move.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the short-run, a new resource will not impact supply
Like the supply for maritime transportation when the steam-engine were invented.
At the beginning of the industrial revolution, the ship keep relying on sails. But, as time passes, the adoption of the new resource and method of production push the Long Run Aggregate Supply. As more transportation was possible with steam-engine using coal.
That will be the case for an improvement in the method of production. Then, following the same example, a change in a better quality of the resource like, replacing the coal engines with diesel engine generates an improvement in the quantity supplied as it is more efficient and can be used
Answer:
2848
Step-by-step explanation:
89 x 32 = 2848
