Answer:
PV(after-tax net return in 7th year) = 70.55 (Approx)
Explanation:
Given:
Number of year = 7
Pre-tax net returns (Fn) = $100
Growth rate = 4% = 0.04
Inflation = 3% = 0.03
Marginal tax rate = 30% = 0.3
Discount rate = 10% = 0.1
Computation:
Fn = Fo(1+g)ⁿ = 100(1.04)⁷
Fn = 131.6
Nominal net returns = 131.6(1.03)⁷
Nominal net returns = 161.85
After tax return = 161.85 (1 - 0.3)
After tax return = 113.30
After-tax, risk adjusted discount rate = 0.1(1-0.3) = 7%
PV(after-tax net return in 7th year) = 113.30
(1+0.07)⁻⁷
PV(after-tax net return in 7th year) = 70.55 (Approx)
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": be driven to a lower price.
Explanation:
Typically, when there is a producer to producer competition, the competing companies tend to <em>lower </em>their product prices. This happens because of the belief consumers are mainly price driven at the moment of discriminating in choosing to buy one good over another. Though, it allows consumers to at least have a couple of sources from where to choose at a fair price.
The law of diminishing marginal returns holds for a situation in which some inputs are variable and some inputs are fixed.
<h3>What is the law of
diminishing marginal returns?</h3>
The law of diminishing marginal returns states that after some optimal level of capacity is reached in a production process, an additional factor of production would result in a lessening of output (quantity of production).
In this context, we can infer and logically deduce that the law of diminishing marginal returns would only hold for an economic situation in which some inputs are variable and some inputs are fixed.
Read more on diminishing marginal returns here: brainly.com/question/13767400
#SPJ1
Answer:
The answer is A. Jessica should get her bachelor’s degree and try to intern with a brownfield redevelopment specialist.
Explanation:
Brownfield Redevelopment Managers help make contaminated lands reusable. So, that would fall into the Health, Safety, and Environmental management career pathway. It's not C because you would need to have a Bachelors degree to be a Health and Safety specialist. The other options are self explanatory.
Answer:
These are the options for the question:
A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.
B. They should be more willing to tear down the $50 million stadium, because it cost more to build.
C. The cost to build the old stadium shouldn’t be considered.
And this is the correct answer:
A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.
Explanation:
City A will likely be more willing to tear down its old stadium because it costed $5 million to build. City B, on the other hand, will have to think twice because a stadium that costed $50 billion to build could have more value than it seems, or the City could simply not have enough money to build a better new stadium (something that would probably cost more than $50 billion to do).
