1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
DENIUS [597]
2 years ago
15

What do you think of a person that choose to die if that is what it takes to continue doing the work that he or she values so mu

ch?
History
1 answer:
Andrew [12]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Well let me put it this way. If someone were to die to be able to continue the work that the "love" so much... then how would they do that work... being passed on? There are more things to live for then just work. I respect it when someone loves something so much they'd die for it.. but I'm not at an understanding on why.

Explanation:

Hope this helps :D Have a great day

You might be interested in
Question 38 of 50
zlopas [31]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

The answer is false

5 0
3 years ago
Based on the statistics provided which power suffered the heaviest loss of civilian life?
nasty-shy [4]

Answer:

Ottoman Empire

Explanation:

they lost over 2 million civs

4 0
3 years ago
6. What type of military tactic was the South trying to accomplish in the Civil War? * (1 Point) they were trying to invade the
Viefleur [7K]

Answer:

infantry tactics

Explanation:

Soldiers were drilled in infantry tactics, usually based upon a manual written before the war by West Point professor William J. Hardee (Rifle and Light Infantry Tactics: for the Instruction, Exercise and Maneuver of Riflemen and Light Infantry, published in 1855).

4 0
3 years ago
Why would Southerners resist some of the efforts of Reconstruction? Use a minimum of two examples from research or from your rea
artcher [175]

Explanation:

Throughout Reconstruction, Southern whites felt threatened by legislation to provide rights for former slaves. The Civil Rights Bill of 1875 was the last rights bill passed by Congress during Reconstruction.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following Supreme Court cases ruled that school sponsored prayer by clergy at a graduation was unconstitutional? En
anastassius [24]

  Althought every case presented in the options was about an aspect of religion in schools the one which ruled that school sponsored prayer by clergy at a graduation was unscontitutional is <em>"Lee v. Weisman"</em> .

  It was the first major school prayer case decided by the Rehnquist court on the year 1992.

<h3>   <u>Context</u></h3>

  Robert E. Lee was the principal of Nathan Bishop Middle School in Providence, Rhode Island. He invited a rabbi to present a prayer at the 1989 graduation ceremony, Deborah Weisman was a student from that class and her parents requested a temporary injunction to ban the rabbi´s presentation. At first instance the Rhode Island court denied the Weisman´s motion, nevertheless the Wesiman family still attended to the graduation and the rabbi gave his speech.

  The Weisman family continued their litigation after the graduation and won in the First Circuit Court of Appeals. The argument of the family was an interpretation of the <em>"Establishment clause"</em>  that sustained the free excercise of religion throughout the country and prohibit the congress to sanction a law about establishing a determinated religion. The interpretation which the family and the Supreme Court held was a broad interpretation.

  After having lost in the First Circuit Court of Appeals the school district appealed to the Supreme Court under the argument that the prayer was nonsectarian and doubly voluntary, Deborah was free not to stand for the prayer and the participation in the ceremony wasn´t obligatory neither.

<h3>   <u>Decision</u> </h3>

  On june 24, 1992 the decision was announced and, as I wrote in the last paragraph, it was a win for the Weisman family as the Court accept the arguements presented by them and reject the ones presented by the school district making special emphasis on the one which said that the attend of Deborah to the graduation was voluntary:

<em>"To say a teenage student has a real choice not to attend her high school graduation is formalistic in the extreme. True, Deborah could elect not to attend commencement without renouncing her diploma; but we shall not allow the case to turn on this point. Everyone knows that, in our society and in our culture, high school graduation is one of life's most significant occasions. A school rule which excuses attendance is beside the point. Attendance may not be required by official decree, yet it is apparent that a student is not free to absent herself from the graduation exercise in any real sense of the term "voluntary," for absence would require forfeiture of those intangible benefits which have motivated the student through youth and all her high school years" </em>Anthony Kennedy.

I hope that the answer is correct and helps you. Regards

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did most people living in Shang China do for work?
    5·2 answers
  • Why where American settlers attracted the great plain in the 18
    10·1 answer
  • Did the french revolution inspire the american revolution apush
    15·1 answer
  • What are some forms of government in the world today?
    14·1 answer
  • Which did the british do during the buildup to the american revolution?
    7·1 answer
  • How did the events at Lexington and Concord affect the creation of the Bill of Rights?
    14·1 answer
  • What does Malala decide after the encounter with her aunt?
    7·2 answers
  • How did the Jews leave the death camps?
    10·2 answers
  • Name of the last Hawaiian queen who was overthrown in her place known as Iolani Palace?
    7·2 answers
  • I need help to find out which one is the answer
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!