The resolving power of the earliest electron microscopes was at least ten times higher than that of the light microscopes, mainly because the wavelength of electrons is much shorter than the wavelength of light.
The electron microscope uses a beam of accelerated electrons to magnify the object whereas the light microscope uses visible light for this purpose. Unlike the light microscope, the electron microscope uses electromagnets as lenses.
The magnification of the electron microscope is much higher as compared to the light microscope and it produces high-resolution images. However, the Specimen preparation of an electron microscope takes several days while the Specimen preparation of the light microscope takes only a few minutes.
If you need to learn more about electron microscopes, click here
brainly.com/question/2437983?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
Answer:
Its D. role of carbon dioxide in photosynthesis.
Explanation:
I know its right bc I just got that question.
The correct answer is - species.
The extinct Caribbean monk seal was a species of seal that lived in a relatively small area in only one prat of the planet. Also, this species lived in waters that are not typical for the other seals. Because the Caribbean monk seal was isolated from the other species of seals, its genes over time became different enough from the other types of seals so that they can not mate and produce offspring between each other. While the isolation made it a unique type of seal, it was also very unfortunate because it meant that it can not be saved, at least in a mixed form, by mating with other seals, so this species of seal went extinct.
Answer:
d. None of these
Explanation:
Probably the identical sequence found in both species<em> </em>is an<em> ultraconserved sequence. </em>
An <u>ultraconserved element</u> is a particular DNI sequence that remains exactly the same through evolution, with almost no modification, and that is shared by at least two completely different species.
These ultraconserved DNI portions seem to be highly essential for life. However, their function could not be determined yet. Most of them do not codify for proteins, but they could play a significant role in gene regulation.
It is suggested that these sequences are so significant for life that only a small change would compromise the organism´s aptitude.
