1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ahat [919]
3 years ago
11

PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mathematics
1 answer:
Triss [41]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The Correct Answer is 30 if your finding the Area of the triangle prism

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
How many ways can you make 35?
Ksju [112]
35 é divisível por 5 e 7
5 e 7 são números primos, logo, 35 pode ser escrito...
5*7, 7*5, 35*1
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the book Essentials of Marketing Research, William R. Dillon, Thomas J. Madden, and Neil H. Firtle discuss a research proposa
MakcuM [25]

Answer:

Null hypothesis:p_{1} = p_{2}  

Alternative hypothesis:p_{1} \neq p_{2}  

z=\frac{0.179-0.15}{\sqrt{0.17(1-0.17)(\frac{1}{140}+\frac{1}{60})}}=0.500  

p_v =2*P(Z>0.500)=0.617  

So the p value is a very low value and using any significance level for example \alpha=0.05, 0,1,0.15 always p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say the two proportions NOT differs significantly.  

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation  

X_{1}=25 represent the number of homeowners who would buy the security system

X_{2}=9 represent the number of renters who would buy the security system

n_{1}=140 sample 1

n_{2}=60 sample 2

p_{1}=\frac{25}{140}=0.179 represent the proportion of homeowners who would buy the security system

p_{2}=\frac{9}{60}= 0.15 represent the proportion of renters who would buy the security system

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)  

p_v represent the value for the test (variable of interest)  

Concepts and formulas to use  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the two proportions differs , the system of hypothesis would be:  

Null hypothesis:p_{1} = p_{2}  

Alternative hypothesis:p_{1} \neq p_{2}  

We need to apply a z test to compare proportions, and the statistic is given by:  

z=\frac{p_{1}-p_{2}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{1}}+\frac{1}{n_{2}})}}   (1)  

Where \hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{25+9}{140+60}=0.17  

Calculate the statistic  

Replacing in formula (1) the values obtained we got this:  

z=\frac{0.179-0.15}{\sqrt{0.17(1-0.17)(\frac{1}{140}+\frac{1}{60})}}=0.500  

Statistical decision

For this case we don't have a significance level provided \alpha, but we can calculate the p value for this test.    

Since is a two sided test the p value would be:  

p_v =2*P(Z>0.500)=0.617  

So the p value is a very low value and using any significance level for example \alpha=0.05, 0,1,0.15 always p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say the two proportions NOT differs significantly.  

6 0
3 years ago
This math promblem!!!!
fiasKO [112]
1. You convert all the numbers into decimals.
   a. For 8 1/9 you multiply 8x9 and add the numerator which in this case is one, so the equation would be 8x9=72     then 72+1= 73
   b. For 81/10 I used a calculator for accuracy and I just divided 81 by 10 because the fraction line can also be used as a division sign. For this I got 8.1
2. Now I looked at all the numbers I had including the fractions I converted to decimals... 8.115, 8.55, 73, and 8.1
3. Lastly, I put the numbers in order from least to greatest: 8.1, 8.115, 8.55, and 73
4. In order to figure out which one is the smallest and largest, I just added zeros on the end of the numbers so they would all be the same: 8.1-->8.100, 8.115 I kept the same because it already had 3 decimal places, 8.55--> 8.550, and 73--> 73.000
5. Then i could tell which number was the largest by the decimal place numbers.
**Hope this was helpful... It's kind of hard to explain online but hopefully you have a better understanding of how to do it!**
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is 4 over 8+ 2 over 8+ 2 over 4?
Lostsunrise [7]
You need LCD or the least common denominator. For 4 over 8 and 2 over 8 have the same denominators except for 2 over 4. You need to ask yourself what times 4 equals to 8? 4 times 2 equals to 8, so multiply 4x2 for the denominator and for the numerator multiply 2x2. Whatever you do to the denominator you have to do the same thing to the numerator. You multiplied 4x2 for the denominator and 2x2 for the numerator and now your fraction is 4 over 8. Now add 4 over 8+ 4 over 8 which is 8 over 8 or 1. Now add 1+ 2 over 8 which is 1 2/8. If you simplify 1 2/8 it will become 1 1/4.

Hope that helped:D
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How to put a fraction on lowest terms?
djverab [1.8K]

Answer: You simplify it.

Step-by-step explanation: You have to take the numerator and the denominator, find the greatest common factor, and divide it until it is at its simplest form.

Hope that helps

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How many more people attended the Magic's games than attended the pacers' games? 582,295 pacers 715,901 magic
    11·2 answers
  • Before ordering food for a company barbecue the president took a poll. She asked people if they would eat the ribs, hamburgers,
    6·1 answer
  • In the diagram the measure of angle 3 is 105 degrees which angle must also measure 105 degrees?
    14·1 answer
  • How do I solve this??
    8·1 answer
  • What is the answer to this question. Please help!
    6·1 answer
  • Round 39.473 to the nearest tenth.<br><br> I need help fast please
    10·2 answers
  • Solve this exponential function 5^3m=125
    8·1 answer
  • Fornite balls.............
    10·2 answers
  • Which statements are true? Select the two correct answers.
    5·1 answer
  • A bookstore orders 200 books. The books are packaged in boxes that hold 24 books each. All the boxes the bookstore receives are
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!