Answer:
The correct answer is Allocative efficiency.
Explanation:
Although there are different evaluation standards for the concept of allocation efficiency, the basic principle states that, in any economic system, the different options in the allocation of resources will produce both "winners" and "losers" in relation to the choice being evaluated. The principles of rational choice theory, individual maximization, utilitarianism and market theory assume, in addition, that the results for both winners and losers can be identified, compared and measured.
From these basic premises, the objective of maximizing the efficiency in the allocation can be defined according to some neutral principle in which some options are considered “objectively better than others”. For example, an economist might say that a change in policy increases the efficiency of allocation, as long as those who benefit from the change (winners) earn more than the losers lose.
------
NOTE: If you need to extend the explanation given, you can make a comment or add a new question. I will be very pleased to help you.
Answer:
Individualistic
Explanation:
Individualistic mindset focuses on the individual and gives them more emphasis than the group.
The opposite of individualism is collectivism or group mentality which emphasise the group over the individual.
To discuss the merger between the two companies, ABC company only sent one person while XYZ company sent 5 people from different departments.
ABC is most likely have a individualistic mindset and they feel one person can handle the negotiation.
On the other hand XYZ sent representatives from each department. This shows the organisation has to agree to the deal so all departments are involved.
The workplace is the location of the arbitrary drug testing. This is done to see if any of the workers are using drugs. The testing aids in determining the quantity and frequency of recent alcohol and illegal substance usage.
The impairment brought on by stress or other factors is not tested during random testing.Employees are subjected to random exams, which are probably inspections of their physical conditions to determine whether they are drug users and how their bodies have been impacted by drugs to the point where they are unable to perform their regular jobs.
Employees who are discovered to be using illicit drugs receive warnings and are fired from their positions.Any unannounced, without prior notice chemical screening for the presence of typically illicit narcotics in a sample of one's blood, hair, or urine is known as a "random drug test."Being unexpected and without prior notice, it is random. This is done to weed out workers who use heavy drugs, which frequently renders them ineffective or ineligible for employment.
To know more about drug- testing visit:
brainly.com/question/15180584
#SPJ4
Answer:
Self-Fulfilling Prophecy
Explanation:
According to the description of the situation in the question we can say that this is an example of a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy. This is because a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy is when a person believes something will happen and subconsciously changes their behavior and causes it to happen. Which is what Kellie has done.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
