Answer:
A
Explanation:
Price elasticity measures the responsiveness of the quantity demanded or supplied of a good to a change in its price. It is computed as the percentage change in quantity demanded—or supplied—divided by the percentage change in price.
Elasticity can be described as elastic—or very responsive—unit elastic, or inelastic—not very responsive.
Elastic demand or supply curves indicate that the quantity demanded or supplied responds to price changes in a greater than proportional manner.
An inelastic demand or supply curve is one where a given percentage change in price will cause a smaller percentage change in quantity demanded or supplied.
Unitary elasticity means that a given percentage change in price leads to an equal percentage change in quantity demanded or supplied.
Answer:
Explanation:
In every single company, the main aim of installing an office equipment is to make profit. After the office equipment made a revenue of $29400, Jing Company incurred expenses of $18500. The value of the equipment was $29400- $18500= $10900. It was sold for $10400 meaning that the net income of the equipment was $10400-$10900= -$500. Therefore, it will incur a net loss of $500.
Answer:
Risk and Return
1. Joe is an average investor. His financial advisor gave him options of investing in stock A, with a σ of 12%, and stock B, with a σ of 9%. Both stocks have the same expected return of 16%. Joe can pick only one stock and decides to invest in stock B.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
2. Marcie works for an educational technology firm that recently launched its employee stock option plan (ESOP). Marcie allocated all her investments in the ESOP.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
3. rin wants to invest in a hedge fund that has had a very strong performance track record. The hedge fund has given its investors a return of over 60% for the past five years. Although Erin is tempted to put her money in the fund, she decides to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund’s assets, because she is aware that past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
Explanation:
1. Joe's decision to invest in stock B is a good financial decision. Since both investments have the same returns, the decision on which investment to take shifts to the standard deviation of the returns, which specifies the variability of the returns. Invariably, the investment with less standard deviation should win the vote. Therefore, Joe's decision is a good financial decision because investment in B has a standard deviation of 9% unlike A's 12%.
2. Putting all eggs in one market as Marcie had done by allocating all her investments in the ESOP is not a good financial decision, theoretically. It is always best to spread the risks, though higher-yielding investments (returns) bear higher risks.
3. The decision of Erin to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund's assets, despite its past performance is a good financial decision. Due diligence reveals some behind-the-scene information that are instrumental in making sound business decisions. Who are the present managers of the fund? What systems are in place in the entity to guarantee similar future performance, all things being equal? What market's sentiments and information are available for consideration? These questions, and many others can be answered through a due diligence. Surely, "past performance is no guarantee of future results."
Answer:
your self-interest; their self interest
Explanation:
When you make a decision to buy a good, you make your choice in your self-interest. There could be different reasons to make such choices. This could be because the good could form part of your basic needs or because the prices are quite low.
When people make a decision to produce the good that you are buying, these people are making their decision in their own self-interest. This could also be to make money.
Answer:
$3,412
Explanation:
The computation of the economic order quantity is shown below:
= 
= 
= 2,954 units
The carrying cost is
= $15.40 × 15%
= $2.31
The number of orders would be equal to
= Annual demand ÷ economic order quantity
= 120,000 ÷ 2,954 units
= 40.62 orders
Now The total cost of ordering cost is
Ordering cost = Number of orders × ordering cost per order
= 40.62 orders × $
84
= $3,412
