1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ainat [17]
2 years ago
5

A random sample of US adults revealed that approximately 68% own their own home. In this same sample, 52% of the respondents had

completed some additional form of education following high school (trade or technical school, 2-year or 4-year college, military training, etc.). Finally, 44% of respondents had completed some additional form of education following high school and owned their own home.
Given that a randomly selected adult from the survey has completed some additional form of education following high school, what is the probability that the person is a homeowner?
a. 0.44
b. 0.647
c. 0.765
d. 0.846
Mathematics
1 answer:
Scrat [10]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

D) 0.846

Step-by-step explanation:

Edge 2021

You might be interested in
Write two different congruent statements that indicate the triangles in each pair are congruent( Odd number questions only)
ryzh [129]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

17) HI ≅ UH   ;   GH  ≅  TU     ; GI  ≅ TH

ΔHGI  ≅ ΔUTH                by Side Side Side congruent

∠G  ≅  ∠T   ; GI  ≅  TH  ; ∠GIH  ≅ ∠THU

ΔHGI  ≅ ΔUTH                by Angel Side Angle congruent

19) IJ ≅ KD   ;  IK ≅ KC   ; KJ ≅ CD

ΔIJK ≅ ΔKDC             by Side Side Side congruent

∠J ≅ ∠D    ; IJ ≅ KD ;  ∠I ≅ ∠DKC

ΔIJK ≅ ΔKDC             by Angle Side Angle congruent

7 0
2 years ago
Hey, can I get some help with this?
algol [13]

Answer:

1.23E7

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A video game company is designing a game based on professional race cars. Professional race cars have a length of 570 cm and a w
siniylev [52]

Answer:

  A) 1/45

  B) 1/60

Step-by-step explanation:

<u>Part A</u>

The actual car has a length to width ratio of ...

  length/width = (570 cm)/(180 cm) = 57/18 = 3 1/6

The rectangle on the screen has a length to width ratio of ...

  length/width = (13 cm)/(4 cm) = 3 1/4

Relative to its width, the screen rectangle is longer than necessary for a model of the car. So, the scale factor will be determined by the width of the car relative to the width of the screen model.

For a model width of 4 cm, the scale factor is ...

  model/life-size = (4 cm)/(180 cm) = 1/45

__

<u>Part B</u>

For a model width of 3 cm, the scale factor is ...

  model/life-size = (3 cm)/(180 cm) = 1/60

7 0
2 years ago
8 4/5 - 2/3 - ? = 3 1/10​
Dimas [21]

Answer: 5 1/30

Step-by-step explanation:

8 + 4/5 - 2/3 - 3 - 1/10 = 5 + 1/30

5 0
2 years ago
Proportional relationships, please answer all of the parts! Thank you!
Natalka [10]

Answer:

a. No (see below)

b. (see below)

c. Johnny

d. Johnny = $12.50 / hour      Doug = $9.16... / hour

e. Doug: extend the table to show how much he gets paid for 1 hour of work (the unit rate)

Johnny: already on the graph

Step-by-step explanation:

a. No. This is because a proportional relationship would have a certain ratio between payment and the amount of time spent working, which would not change. However, if Doug's neighbour pays him $55 for 6 hours, it's likely that this is not a proportional relationship, or we would be able to divide $55 by the 6 hours Doug spent working.

b. Even though above I said that it's probably not a proportional relationship, if it were, we would have to divide everything equally. I'm guessing the table should look like this:

                            Doug

       Time (hr)                      Earnings ($)

          4                                  $36.66...

          5                                  $45.8333...

          6                                  $55

          7                                  $64.4666....

          8                                  $73.333...

To work out how much Doug would get for working 4 hours:

4/6 x $55 = 2/3 x $55 = $36.66... (so definitely not a proportional relationship)

To work out how much Doug would get for working 5 hours:

5/6 x $55 = $45.8333.... (more evidence that this is not a proportional relationship)

To work out how much Doug would get for working 7 hours (we already got 6 hours):

7/6 x $55 = $64.4666...

To work out how much Doug would get for working 8 hours:

8/6 x $55 = $73.33... (we could double the 4 hour payment, but this is probably more accurate)

c. Johnny is getting paid more. If we look at how much Doug gets for 6 hours, it's $55. If we look out at how much Johnny gets for 6 hours, it's $75. (If we do the same with the other amounts of time, it's the same.

4 hours: D = $36.67 vs J = $50

5 hours: D = $45.83 VS J = $60

etc...

d. Johnny gets $75 per 6 hours --> 75/6 = $12.50 per hour

Doug gets $55 per 6 hours --> 55/6 = $9.1666... per hour

e. Carry on the table for Doug all the way to 1, so you can see the how much Doug gets paid for 1 hour of work (i.e. the minimum).

The unit rate is already on the graph for Johnny.

HOPE THIS HELPED :)

P.S. Mate cld you please give me Brainliest? That table took so much dam work

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the interquartile range of this data set -5,-4,-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3,4,5,7,7,7
    9·1 answer
  • Which points lie on the line y = 3x - 7?
    6·1 answer
  • 10−y=2.301<br> please find y
    11·1 answer
  • Solve for x: x = 7 = 16<br> A. x=9<br> B. X=23<br> C. X= 112
    8·2 answers
  • Integrate from 0 to pi/2 (sinx + cosx)/(9+16sin(2x)) dx
    7·1 answer
  • Work out the value of x and y in this diagram. All measurement are in centimeters​
    14·1 answer
  • What is this??? 28÷7×4=?
    7·1 answer
  • 8. Archie plotted the points on the graph below to show how the amount he owes for tuition decreases as the number of tuition pa
    11·1 answer
  • The table below shows the meal cost and tip for the last 10 tables that a waiter served.
    9·1 answer
  • A ball bearing has mass 0.44 pounds. 1 kg = 2.2 pounds. <br>​
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!