Answer:
Novak Company Journal. $
June 1
1. Purchases Dr. 26,026
Vendor. Cr. 26,026
Narration purchase of stock
2.Vendor Dr 1078
Return outward Cr. 1078
Narration. Return on goods purchased.
3. Customer Dr 31753
Sales. Cr. 31753
Narration. Good sold to customer
Answer: a.19.59% b.15.11%.
Explanation:
Average tax rate is given as the total tax paid divided by total taxable income which is expressed as a percentage and must be less than the marginal tax rate.
Chandler is single and reports
taxable income of $132,200.
Tax liability: 25,903
Marginal rate: 24 %
Average rate: 17.94 x % = wrong
Average rate = total liable tax/ total income= 25, 903/ 132,200=0.195937 rounded to 0.1959
0.1959 x 100 = 19.59%.correct
b. Lazare, a head of household, records
taxable income of $80,600.
Tax liability: 12,176
Marginal rate: 22 %
Average rate: 12.30 X %= wrong
Average rate = total liable tax/ total income= 12,176/ 80,600= .0.15106= 0.1511
0.1511 x 100 = 15.11%.correct.
1) Town of Bayport:
We have that the residents value the fireworks at
a total of 50+100+300=450$. That is the utility they gain. But they
would also have to pay 360$ for the fireworks. The total outcome is
450$+(-360$)=90$. Hence, the outcome is positive and the fireworks pass
the cost benefit analysis.
If the fireworks' cost is to be split
equally, we have that each of the 3 residents has to pay 360/3=120$. Let
us now do the cost-benefit analysis for everyone.
Jacques stands to gain 50$ from the fireworks but would have to pay 120$. He will vote against it.
Also, Kyoko will gain 100$ but would have to pay 120$. He will lose utility/money from this so he will vote against.
Musashi on the other hand, would gain 300$ and only pay 120$. He is largely benefitted by this measure. Only he would
We have that 2 out of the 3 would vote against the fireworks, so that the fireworks will not be bought. The vote does not yield the same answer as the benefit-cost analysis.
2) Town of River Heights:
We have that the total value of the fireworks to the community
is 20+140+160=320$. The total value of the fireworks is lower than
their cost so their cost benefit analysis yields that they should not be
bought.
However, let's see what each resident says. The cost to each resident is 360/3=120$. Rina is against the fireworks since she will only gain 20$. Sean and Yvette are for the fireworks since they gain 140$ and 160$ respectively, which are larger than the cost of the fireworks to each of them (120$). Hence, 2 will vote for the fireworks and one will vote against and fireworks will be bought.
Again, the vote clashes with the cost-benefit analysis.
3) The first choice is wrong. It is very difficult for a government to provide the exact types of public goods that everyone wants because that would be too costly; one cannot have a public good that everyone pays for so that only a couple of people enjoy it. In our example, we saw that in every case, a public good and its production would have sime supporters and some adversaries.
Majority rule is not always the most efficient way to decide public goods; as we have seen in the second case, the cost-benefit analysis yields that the fireworks are not worth it but they are approved by the majority nonetheless.
The final sentence is correct. The differing preferences of the people make a clearcut choice impossible and the government has to take into account various tradeoffs and compromises in order to determine which public goods to provide.
From what I understood in the problem, the total budget that covers all types of media is only $1,000 per month. For the allocation, each type of media would get at least 25% of the budget. If we infer on this information, there should only be 4 types of media, at least. This is because four 25% portions would equal to 100%. If it exceeds 25% for each of the four types, it would be over the $1000 budget. With that being said, it is also possible that there will be 3 or 2 types of media. Nevertheless, let's just stick to the least assumption of 25% for each of the 4 types.
If local newspaper advertising is one of the four types, then:
$1000(25%) = $250
It would get $250 from the overall budget.
It is true that a perfectly competitive industry faces a horizontal straight line demand curve whereas a monopoly faces a downward sloping demand curve.
<h3>What is competitive market?</h3>
A perfect competitive market has a straight line graph on the demand of goods and services this means that the goods are sold at the market price. Monopoly market price are not regulated hence the curve is not straight.
Therefore, It is true that a perfectly competitive industry faces a horizontal straight line demand curve whereas a monopoly faces a downward sloping demand curve.
Learn more on competitive market below
brainly.com/question/25717627
#SPJ11
