Tevye's analogy is faulty in this situation because "Tevye's analogy is supporting the idea of marrying only Jews; however, it does not explain
the reason why this is supposed to happen".
<h3>How Tevye's analogy is different</h3>
Tevye's analogy is faulty in this situation because it doesn't give reasons to why one is supposed to "seek his own kind".
It is good to seek one's own kind so as to avoid the cultural problem in marriage. It helps to solve the problem of origin differences.
Culture is very important in any relationship. In order not to have different perspectives on an issue, it is ideal to go into relationships with people of the same culture.
Learn more about analogy:
brainly.com/question/13978016
The sentence which uses possessive personal pronouns correctly is sentence (d).<span>Did you eat the whole potato and its skin?
the rest of the sentences should've been written like this:
</span><span>Alicia thought that the blue jacket was hers.
</span><span>The dolphin bobbed its head up and down.
</span><span>Yours was the one with the blue tag, on the table.</span>
Answer:
How does Aunt Alexandra feel about the Finch family name? She is proud of it because they are an old Southern family
The very first part “The students completed the math assignment” is not parallel with its other parts. Since the other sentences discuss either English or words/terms, it wouldn’t be a good idea to add the first sentence in this.
The main verb in the sentence above is indefinite.
