Answer:
A: (0,0), B: (3, -4), 5 units
Step-by-step explanation:
A: (0,0), B: (3, -4)
To find the distance, use the distance formula. Square-root((0-3)^2+(0-(-4))^2) ---> Square-root((-3)^2 + 4^2) ---> Square-root(9+16) ---> Square-root(25) ---> 5units.
Answer:
243 or 3^5
Step-by-step explanation:
You can do the product by multiplying starting from the left.
3 * 3 * 3 * 3 * 3 =
= 9 * 3 * 3 * 3
= 27 * 3 * 3
= 81 * 3
= 243
You can also change it to an exponential form.
3 * 3 * 3 * 3 * 3 = 3^5
A is the correct answer. A coefficient is just a number that appears in front of a variable. Please note that a number that doesn't have a variable behind it is still a coefficient since there is technically a variable behind it with a power of 0.
9514 1404 393
Answer:
a) see the attached spreadsheet (table)
b) Calculate, for a 10-year horizon; Computate for a longer horizon.
c) Year 13; no
Step-by-step explanation:
a) The attached table shows net income projections for the two companies. Calculate's increases by 0.5 million each year; Computate's increases by 15% each year. The result is rounded to the nearest dollar.
__
b) After year 4, Computate's net income is increasing by more than 0.5 million per year, so its growth is faster and getting faster yet. However, in the first 10 years, Calculate's net income remains higher than that of Computate. If we presume that some percentage of net income is returned to investors, then Calculate may provide a better return on investment.
The scenario given here is only interested in the first 10 years. However, beyond that time frame (see part C), we find that Computate's income growth far exceeds that of Calculate.
__
c) Extending the table through year 13, we see that Computate's net income exceeds Calculate's in that year. It continues to remain higher as long as the model remains valid.