9514 1404 393
Answer:
it depends on the accuracy and resolution required of the answer
Step-by-step explanation:
The shaded portion appears to be about half the length of the unshaded portion, suggesting the shaded amount is 1/3.
__
Using a pair of dividers, one could determine the number of times the shaded portion fits into the whole bar. Depending on how much is left over, the process could repeat to determine the approximate size of the remaining fraction relative to the bar or to the shaded portion. (Alternatively, one could replicate the length of the bar to see what integer number of shaded lengths fit into what integer number of whole lengths.)
One could measure the shaded part and the whole bar with a ruler, then determine the relative size of the shaded part by dividing the first measurement by the second. The finer the divisions on the ruler, the better the approximation will be.
Answer:Your left hand side evaluates to:
m+(−1)mn+(−1)m+(−1)mnp
and your right hand side evaluates to:
m+(−1)mn+(−1)m+np
After eliminating the common terms:
m+(−1)mn from both sides, we are left with showing:
(−1)m+(−1)mnp=(−1)m+np
If p=0, both sides are clearly equal, so assume p≠0, and we can (by cancellation) simply prove:
(−1)(−1)mn=(−1)n.
It should be clear that if m is even, we have equality (both sides are (−1)n), so we are down to the case where m is odd. In this case:
(−1)(−1)mn=(−1)−n=1(−1)n
Multiplying both sides by (−1)n then yields:
1=(−1)2n=[(−1)n]2 which is always true, no matter what n is
Answer:
25 ft
Step-by-step explanation:
The tree's shadow is 4 times the length of the man's shadow, so we presume the tree is 4 times the height of the man: 4 × (6 ft 3 in) = (24 ft 12 in) = 25 ft.
The answer is 7 and 4/ 7+4+11 and 7-4=3!
