<span>Women and men differ in their career choices both across and within fields, and psychology is no exception. Although subfield segregation has been reduced over the years, subfield differences persist (see Table 1). For example, in 2002, 82.7% of PhDs in developmental psychology were awarded to women, while only 56.2.% of PhDs in experimental psychology were awarded to women. (We excluded comparative, psychometrics, quantitative, and personality because of the small number of graduates: 7, 13, 8, and 23, respectively.) However, of new PhDs awarded in psychology in 2002, women earned more than 50% across all subfields (again, excluding comparative, psychometrics, quantitative, and personality). Unfortunately, the increasing number and proportions of psychologists who are women have not translated into equal professional participation across various subfields and leadership positions within psychology.</span>
It seem like there are information missing on the question posted. Let me answer this question with all I know. So here is what I believe the answer is, rallies are made everywhere.
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
Answer:
1. The author uses the words "undefined", "unbounded" and "immense" to describe the powers of the constitution.
2. Upset: it makes the Congress even more powerful than it’s previous long list of expressed powers
3. A Bill of Rights is necessary to protect the rights of citizens. The proposed Constitution does not do enough.
4. Yes he does, and it matters because if you don’t trust the people in power you wouldn’t have a real nation.
5.He seems more like an Anti-Federalist.
Part Two
1. Unnecessary and dangerous
2. From the Federalist No.84
3. No because he believes that its unnecessary and not needed in the constitution.
4. That the bill of rights is pointless and not realistic for the American people.
5 He is defiantly Anti-Federalist; He goes against everything Federalism is for.
Answer:
A.) Nina studied as hard as she could to score 100 on her math test.
Explanation:
Nina 'sought' her textbook to study for her text.
The word 'sought' is the past participle of 'seek'.
She 'seeked' her textbook to study for her test.
Answer:
This cognitive distortion is known as personalization.
Explanation:
Cognitive distortions are the result of an irrational thought that comes after a negative feeling. As the name states, they <em>distort</em> or <em>twist </em>reality for an individual, making him/her see reality in a certain way unable to understand that it is not exactly reality.
Personalization occurs when an individual relates external issues with him/herself <em>without general proof </em>or a base.
In this case, Natalie is blaming herself entirely for the breakup, relating external causes to herself without proof, thinking if she had done something different she wouldn't be alone.