The correct answer is (B) False.
There is not as much energy used to add a phosphate group by means of phosphorolysis, as the energy required adding a phosphate using ATP.
What is Phosphorolysis?
- Glycogen phosphorolysis is a process that occurs at the start of glycogen breakdown. As a result, glucose can be produced from glycogen.
- Glycogen phosphorolylsis catalyzes glycogen phosphorolytic cleavage, resulting in glycogen-1-phosphate.
- However, when cleaving glucose from glycogen, a non-reducing terminal is eliminated.
- Furthermore, phosphoglucomutase can convert glucose-1-phosphate generated from glycogen into G6P, allowing it to go directly to glycolysis.
- It should be noted that going straight to glycolysis eliminates the need for ATP to convert glucose to G6P.
- If the glucose created by glycolysis is consumed, three ATPs are produced.
- Phosphorolysis requires less energy than ATP to add a phosphate group.
To learn more about Phosphorolysis refer to:
brainly.com/question/28162314
#SPJ4
If the image contains life forms and living things, then it is the biosphere.
If the image contains frozen water bodies, such as the arctic tundra, it is the cryosphere.
If the image contains soil and other solid abiotic components of the Earth, then it is the geosphere.
If the image contains water in the liquid form, then it is the hydrosphere.
<span> For a start, when you have a question that needs answering in science, you formulate a null hypothesis. That is a negative statement which you then set out to prove or disprove. This is just a convention. So if your initial question is for example, "Does sugar dissolve in water?"
Your null hypothesis will be "Sugar does not dissolve in water."
You then set up your experiment and get some data.
Now if your data doesn't support your null hypothesis then you reject it and make the statement ,"Sugar does dissolve in water." As you can see from this simple example, a non-result is still a result so the idea of formulating new tests as mentioned by another answerer isn't necessary and in some ways is the incorrect thing to do. In science, hypotheses are often not supported by data and i would argue that this is the case a lot of the time. A non-result is still a result and you will have plenty to write about whichever way it goes. </span>
B is the answer for your question
