Answer: weeks ago
Explanation:
like if you said that you like your car so much and someone did something to it
Bureaucracy is the executive branch
Answer: :)
Explanation: I do not think he will get into trouble if he has nothing to do with it.
When a judge issues an injunction or orders a specific performance, this is an example of the judge’s power: TRUE
<h3>
Who is a judge?</h3>
- A judge is a person who, either alone or as part of a panel of judges, presides over court proceedings.
- A judge hears all of the witnesses and any other evidence presented by the case's barristers or solicitors, evaluates the parties' credibility and arguments, and then issues a ruling in the case based on their interpretation of the law and their own personal judgment.
- A judge is expected to preside over the trial impartially and in public.
- Judges' powers, functions, methods of appointment, discipline, and training differ greatly across jurisdictions.
- The judge's powers may be shared with a jury in some jurisdictions.
- The presiding judge is responsible for ensuring that all court proceedings are lawful and orderly.
- A judge's power is demonstrated when he or she issues an injunction or orders a specific performance.
Therefore, the statement "when a judge issues an injunction or orders a specific performance, this is an example of the judge’s power" is TRUE.
Know more about judges here:
brainly.com/question/4559559
#SPJ4
The complete question is given below:
when a judge issues an injunction or orders specific performance, this is an example of the judge’s power. TRUE or FALSE
Answer:
There’s a part of Plato’s Republic (c. 380 BC) which is fascinating because it resembles a prophecy about Jesus. It appears in this dialog by Socrates about the just man, especially in the italicized portion:
And at [the unjust man’s] side let us place the just man in his nobleness and simplicity, wishing, as Aeschylus says, to be and not to seem good. There must be no seeming, for if he seem to be just he will be honoured and rewarded, and then we shall not know whether he is just for the sake of justice or for the sake of honours and rewards; therefore, let him be clothed in justice only, and have no other covering; and he must be imagined in a state of life the opposite of the former. Let him be the best of men, and let him be thought the worst; then he will have been put to the proof; and we shall see whether he will be affected by the fear of infamy and its consequences. And let him continue thus to the hour of death; being just and seeming to be unjust. When both have reached the uttermost extreme, the one of justice and the other of injustice, let judgment be given which of them is the happier of the two.