Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 1432
p = 23% = 0.23
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of theft complaints , x = 321
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.298
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Answer:
$80 billion, $480 billion
Step-by-step explanation:
E2020
X/3 > 7 <== ur equation
multiply both sides by 3
x > 7 * 3
x > 21 <== ur solution
Answer:
5.3
Step-by-step explanation:
You use the Pythagoras theorem which is a^2+b^2=c^2.
Since you're solving for a side length that's not the hypotenuse you will manipulate the equation to c^2-a^2=b^2. From here you just plug in numbers.
8^2 - 6^2 = b^2
64 - 36 = b^2
b = sqrt(28)
b = 5.2915.... = 5.3
25 * 5 + 15 * 3 - 40 * 2 =
125 + 45 - 80 =
170 - 80 =
90