1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marianna [84]
2 years ago
7

Describe the techniques used to make mud bricks.

History
1 answer:
Volgvan2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Adobe bricks (mud bricks) are made of earth with a fairly high clay content and straw. If produced manually the earth mix is cast in open moulds onto the ground and then left to dry out. Adobe bricks are only sun-dried, not kiln-fired. When used for construction they are laid up into a wall using an earth mortar.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Explain why Europeans felt it was their duty to colonize African countries.
elena55 [62]

Answer:

European powers became more and more interested in gaining territories for themselves. Many European countries felt that their resources were in short supply after industrialization and were keen to find new resources such as gold and ivory.

3 0
3 years ago
Choose the hominid that scientists believe is NOT a direct ancestor of modern people.
Serggg [28]
I just did this hold on let me grab my answer rq then I can answer this
5 0
2 years ago
Which of the following examples shows the separation of powers and checks and balances of the Roman Republic?
Sergio039 [100]

Answer:

All of the choices are correct. The fact that Censors appointed, and could remove, senators;  Tribunes could veto laws; and Consuls were elected for one-year terms are examples of the separation of powers and checks and balances of the Roman Republic.

Explanation:

The Roman Republic was a political regime with a highly original approach. A regime that, despite all its political intrigues, reached almost 500 years. Probably, one of the reasons why it lasted so long is because it was a carefully balanced system. In this regard, the Greek historian Polybius said that Rome had a mixed government, fruit of a process that he called anacyclosis. It is known as such, to the succession of a series of political systems due to its irremediable tendency towards degeneration. Consequently, Rome knew a monarchy that degenerated into tyranny, also an aristocracy that ended up being oligarchic, until finally it reached a system closer to democracy.

In this way, the Roman Republic could contain features of these three political systems, thus giving it, according to Polybius, a certain superiority. Why? Because the main elements of the republic, which embody each of the three systems, must cooperate so that it works. For example, for a war, the consul - monarchy - will need, both a resolution of the senate -aristocracy- for the sending of legions, and the approval of the people (in elections) -democracy-, since it is whoever annuls or ratifies the armistices and treaties. In addition, the Senate will also depend on the people, because it is the people who, after the deliberation of the Senate, must approve those procedures in which there are crimes against the State that are punished with the death penalty. Likewise, the people will need the Senate insofar as this chamber is fundamental to carry out the public works that are first executed through the management of the town.  

What does the description described so far mean? Simply, that we are before a forerunner of the system of checks and balances. The current one, coming from Locke and Montesquieu, proposes a division between executive, legislative and judicial. But its old equivalent did not distinguish between powers, but forced an interorganic cooperation. In this way, in order to carry out certain competences, it might be necessary for two or more bodies to collaborate, thus preventing any of them from acting in a despotic manner. Meanwhile, there is currently a division of competence according to which each body has established guidelines, and the key to avoid despotism is precisely the opposite: that none of them interfere in the competencies of others.

5 0
3 years ago
Question 14(4 points)
Illusion [34]

Answer:

its A sorry if im wrong

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
The government of Israel can be classified as a parliamentary democracy. Which statement provides the BEST definition of this ty
horsena [70]
<span>A)
a government ruled by an elected legislature and a prime minister</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why was the first smartphone considered a disruptive technology?
    7·2 answers
  • Use the drop-down menus to complete each sentence.
    8·2 answers
  • What advantage did Portugal have over other exploring countries?
    9·2 answers
  • . Identify the three principles of the Federal Election<br> Campaign Act.
    11·1 answer
  • When a volcano that is often active is not erupting at present , we say that it is?
    8·1 answer
  • Plzz help I’m stuck
    14·1 answer
  • ruta histórica digital en la que muestre los puntos de ingreso y posterior fundación de ciudades por parte de los españoles en e
    8·1 answer
  • What can be inferred from these passages?
    15·2 answers
  • What effect did woodblock printing have on Chinese society?
    14·2 answers
  • Which scenario is illegal under the Equal Pay Act of 1963?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!