<u>Explanation:</u>
In the given case it is valid contract as there is time, promise, benefit and obligation to do thing. But verbal contracts are difficult to prove. Stan and Byron have a verbal contract which is a promise for 10 days and the contract has exchange of goods for $600. Offer is made by Byron but the acceptance is not yet given by Stan.
Here only the offer is made and it is not yet accepted by Byron. here Stan has revoked the offer through letter so the revoke has been communicated to the other party through letter. So in this case there is no breach of contract as the contract was clearly revoked by Stan through his letter.
Answer:
Wyatt
Explanation:
High outcome interpendence is a concept that encourages cooperation between members on a team. It shows that if a team wins all members will benefit, and if the team fails all members will be adversely affected.
In this scenario Wyatt who is a slacker in the team of Nick will stand to gain more.
In a high outcome interpendence scenario Nick will be forced to improve on the performance of Wyatt in order to meet team objectives.
The other average workers will only gain a little from increased cooperation.
You need to go into excel and make it there
Answer:
Blockbusting
Explanation:
The practice of making false statements about a property in order to lower its value and increase the buyer’s profit is called Blockbusting. Blockbusting is the method of convincing landlords to sell estate cheaply, which was done by the U.S. property agents and construction developers and they do this by developing terror in the people that people with different racial and class will be soon relocating in the neighborhood and hence benefiting via reselling at a more expensive cost.
