Answer:
The redundant expenditure on festivals or feasts can be used for productive purposes like healthcare, infrastructure, education, saving for an emergency, etc.
Explanation:
As we know, the celebration of any festival causes extravagant and improvident expenditure on the unnecessary arrangement of feasts, new clothes, jewelleries, decorations, and much more. This obstructs the development process of society as it prevents people from investing money into productive purposes like healthcare, education, improving the quality of their life, or saving it for future emergencies. If the lavish expenditure on festivals is prevented, the future of our society can be brighter, safer, and more developed.
In order for the student to be able to properly test the hypothesis, it will be needed that certain data is collected first. The student will have to take the most important things in consideration about the creosote bush, like would it be able to survive under shade (much limited sunlight), would it be able to sustain increased amount of moisture (the solar panels will keep some of the moisture below them), but also being exposed under high temperature. The conditions for the creosote bush will change significantly, so these three things will be of crucial importance to be tested, since it is a very specialized plant, and those types of plants usually react very badly on sudden changes.
Answer:
responding
Explanation:
Listening is the active processes of trying to make meaning of a verbally communicated message. There are four stages of listening, which are; hearing, understanding, evaluating and responding. Responding are actions that shows that an individual regards the message that is being communicated, this could involve nodding, shrugging and even verbal acknowledgement such as exclamations.
Evan responded to his wife's conversation by shrugging.
Answer:
D) The Soviet economy was a tremendous success story; the USSR would still be together if it were not for the ethnic differences.
Explanation:
The Soviet economy was not a tremendous success, in fact, it was in many aspects a failure (although it was a success in some fields).
The other 3, true statements in the question give us a clue why:
The Soviet system benefited the center (Russia) disproportionally, leaving aside the other, peripheral republics in Central Asia, the Caucasus, The Baltics, and Eastern Europe, which were often very poor.
The Soviet system used a planned economy, instead of a market economy, and this led to many errors in the production of goods and services. Resources were often poured in unprofitable industries over more profitable ones, and the geographical location of the economic sectors often did not make sense.
Things that in a market system would likely not happen, ocurred in the soviet planned economy because the planners did not realize their mistakes.
