This property is called the distributive property. It is when you distribute the number outside the parenthesis into the numbers and letters inside the parenthesis.
Example:
7(x-3) = 7x-21
10(x+5+8) = 10x+50+80 = 10x +130
be sure to simplify like terms as in the example above
10 ( x²+5x³+2x²) = 10x²+50x³+20x² = 30x²+50x³
answer: 30x²+50x³
hope this helps
Answer:
a-1) Pv = 52549
a-2) Pv = 56822
b-1) Fv = 77570
b-2 Fv = 83878
Explanation:
b-1) Future value:
S= Sum of amount of annuity=?
n=number of fixed periods=5 years
R=Fixed regular payments=13200
i=Compound interest rate= .081 (suppose annualy)
we know that ordinary annuity:
S= R [(1+i)∧n-1)]/i
= 13200[(1+.081)∧5-1]/.081
=13200(1.476-1)/.081
= 13200 * 5.8765
S = 77570
a.1)Present value of ordinary annuity:
Formula: Present value = C* [(1-(1+i)∧-n)]/i
=13200 * [(1-(1+.081)∧-5]/.081
=13200 * (1-.6774)/.081
=13200 * (.3225/.081)
=52549
a.2)Present value of ordinary Due:
Formula : Present value = C * [(1-(1+i)∧-n)]/i * (1+i)
= 13200 * [(1- (1+.081)∧-5)/.081 * (1+.081)
= 13200 * 3.9822 * 1.081
= 56822
b-2) Future value=?
we know that: S= R [(1+i)∧n+1)-1]/i ] -R
= 13200[ [ (1+.081)∧ 5+1 ]-1/.081] - 13200
= 13200 (.5957/.081) -13200
= (13200 * 7.3544)-13200
= 97078 - 13200
= 83878
Answer and Explanation:
Respected Sir,
Sub: Absorption costing to analyze product costs and subsequent cost-volume-profit decisions
As per your requirement please find the explanation below:
Absorption costing is a process by which we add part of the fixed overhead to the production expense of the goods. If we do on a per-unit basis. Here we will compute by dividing the fixed costs by the number of units that we built and sold over the era. Whereas Variable costing includes fixed overhead as a lump sum instead of a per-unit price.
Under this process, all your variable costs like equipment, raw materials, and shipping are included. We will add the maximum fixed overhead costs for the duration. Such costs are not calculated on a per-unit basis. Rather than we deduct them as a lump-sum expense from your income amount.
Variable costing is really useful as it reveals the earnings after all the expenses are paid for the accounting period. While you would not have earned revenue for the goods we purchased as some may be in the inventory, we are showing you have paid all of your expenses for the time. We have excess revenue when you actually sell the finished goods in the warehouse.
The absorption approach is not all that effective as absorption costing will inflate the income figures excessively in any given span of accounting. Since you're not going to subtract any of your fixed costs as we did not sell any of us produced goods, our profit and loss report doesn't reflect the maximum expenses you've had for the time. Therefore, these results may mislead us when our profitability is analyzed.
Regards
ABC
Explanation:
December 31, 2016: To record accrued wages for one day (10 workers × $145) = $1,450.
January 4, 2017: To record accrued and current wages.
Wages expense = 10 workers × 3 days × $145 = $4,350
Cash = 10 workers × 4 days × $145 = $5,800.
See attached photo.
