Answer:
Maurya Empire was vaster as compared to Gupta Empire. Mauryan rulers followed a centralized administration structure, whereas Gupta rulers followed a decentralized administrative structure. The Tax system during the Mauryan dynasty was stringent; whereas Gupta rulers favored more liberal tax system.
Explanation:
Having crew members repeat back instructions to clarify what they have heard is one way to catch mistakes before they happen.
In our day-to-day life, we make our best decisions when we gather a lot of information. If we take the case of wildland fire fighting, we should be situationally aware to face the threat. We should know what’s going on around us—and should immediately share vital information about hazards with our supervisor and crew members in order to adopt safety measures and avoid mistakes. Situational awareness does not maintain an “off switch” when we are working near a fire.
It is somehow tempting to focus on what will be in front of us if we have got a specific task, but clarify to not forget to look up once in a while as there will be a lot going on over our head. When we look up we may encounter any number of potential hazards.
Learn to know more about crew members with the equipment or tasks they handle on
brainly.com/question/21153861
#SPJ4
Answer: Psychoanalysis.
Explanation:
Sigmund Freud (1856 – 1939) was the founder of the Psychoanalytic approach, which examines unconscious impulses to explain human behavior. Freud maintained that the mind had both conscious and unconscious thoughts, developed based on psychic forces, and trauma could be cured by transforming unconscious thoughts and motivations into conscious ideas, therefore providing insight.
Proximate cause is the determination that the defendant's breach of duty resulted directly in the plaintiff's injury
A defense to negligence. An unforeseeable event that interrupts the causal chain between the defendant's breach of duty and the damages the plaintiff suffered. Allow the defendant to avoid liability because they are evidence that the defendant's breach of duty was not the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries.