Answer:
See below
Explanation:
It is to be noted that under IFR, inventories are carried at a lower of cost or net realizable value, which is $550,000 in this scenario.
Also, under the United states GAAP, inventories are carried at a lower of cost or market . Here, the replacement cost of $525,000 would be used because it is below NRV and its equal to the difference between NRV and normal profit margin.
Salutations!
In the 1960s, a popular ad stated that "blondes have more fun!" this is an example of ______.
<span>In the 1960s, a popular ad stated that "blondes have more fun!" this is an example of positive correlation. Positive correlation means that two or more thing are probable to happen at once.
Hope I helped :D</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": The EPBO is recorded in the accounts.
Explanation:
The Expected Postretirement Obligation (EPBO) is an estimation of the value of the benefits employees will receive upon retirement including all the time workers remained in the firm. This is merely a calculation and is not subject to any type of transaction to be recorded in the company's books. The EPBO is not related to workers' pensions.
The answer is True because it depends on both
Answer:
1. <em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>
<em>
</em>2<em>. If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John which will be $80,000</em>
<em />
Explanation:
In contributory negligence, the defense completely bars plaintiffs from any recovery if they contribute to their own injury through their own negligence.
<em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>
<em>
</em>
In comparative negligence, the plaintiff's damages is award by the percentage of fault that the fact-finder assigns to the plaintiff for his or her own injury i.e the plaintiff's damage compensation is reduced by percentage of his/her percentage of fault.
<em>If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John</em>
this is 80% of $100,00 which is equal to <em>$80,000</em>
