Answer:
1. C. c. material, machinery/equipment, manpower, and methods.
2. E. All are correct
Explanation:
1. The cause-and-effect diagram also known as the Ishikawa diagram is used by organizations to find out the likely causes of unwanted problems. This diagram traces the roots of problems and helps managers discover the potential causes of these problems. The four M's that form the bone of the diagram to which other causes are traced include the;
a. material, which is about the products used in the production process and potential problems that can be attributed to them.
b. machinery/equipment, which is about the plant and likely problems that can arise from their use.
c. manpower, which is about the personnel used in the production process, and,
d. methods, which is about the systems adopted by the organization.
2. A systematic approach to capacity decisions include;
a. Estimation of capacity requirements
b. Identification of gaps by comparing the expected requirements with available capacity.
c. Develop alternative plans and methods that would help to reduce the gaps.
d. Evaluate the alternatives taking into consideration their qualitative and quantitative attributes.
Answer:
C
though all had the 4p elements only c had a chance to build the business
Answer:
$22,050
Explanation:
The computation of the total budgeted variable selling and administrative expenses for October is shown below:
Sales Commission (9,000 × $0.60) $5,400
Shipping (9,000 × $1.2) $10,800
Advertising (9,000 × 0.3) $2,700
Other (9,000 × .35) $3,150
Budgeted Variable Selling and admin expenses $22,050
We simply added all the variable selling and admin expenses so that the total could arrive
Answer: $4950
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that a company issues 9% bonds with a par value of $110,000 at par on January 1 and that the market rate on the date of issuance was 8% and also that the bonds pay interest semiannually on January 1 and July 1.
There is no discount on the bonds payable because they are issues at par. Therefore, the cash paid on July 1 to the bond holders will be:
= $110,000 x 9% x 6/12
= $110,000 x 9/100 x 6/12
= $110,000 x 0.09 x 0.5
= $4,950
Answer:
Please refer to the below;
Explanation:
Difference between Floor inspection and Functional inspection.
• Floor inspection is usually conducted in a production environment. It involves checking of materials while processing in the machine by inspectors. Rather than checking the materials in the machine at the beginning of production, floor inspection checks the materials while in process inorder to ensure that the defected ones are quickly detected and expunged. It also ensure that the equipments used in processing are properly functioning.
• Functional inspection is an inspection that checks the overall function of a product rather than what makes up the component parts. For instance the load capacity and speed of a vehicle can be checked for optimal performance whereas individual parts that make up the vehicle are not checked, yet bring out satisfactory performance when combined together. This form of inspection is concerned with verification of final output and does not provide details about different sections instead provides a wider understanding of comfort that emanate from inspecting same item.
Points of Convergence between Floor inspection and Functional inspection.
• The key objective of both floor and functional inspection is quality output having reviewed and examined their expectations.
• Both floor and functional inspection work to prevent defective product from flowing down the successive operations and avoid loss to the company
• Both floor and functional inspection aim at meeting customers requirements, wants and needs.
