okay so go down to -8 and then you would from there go up four and over one.
i hope this helps!
Answer: no i do not agree.
Step-by-step explanation:
Try n = 2 and you will see the answer
8(2) + 6
16 + 6
22
2{4(2) + 3}
2(8+3)
2(11)
22
14(2)
All 3 do not equal to each other. Proving that Juwon's statement is wrong.
Answer:
= 24 3/4x
Step-by-step explanation:
3* 8 1/4x
Here 8 1/4 is a mixed fraction.
Convert it to improper fraction
8 1/4 = 33/4
So, 3*33/4 x
99/4 x
= 24 3/4x
That is
Hope this will helpful.
gimmie brainlist :)
Answer:
The correct option is C.
Step-by-step explanation:
Two figures are congruent if their corresponding sides are congruent.
We know that, reflection, rotation and translation are rigid transformation. It means the size and shape of image and preimage are same. We can say that in rigid transformation, the image and preimage are congruent.
Dilation is not a rigid transformation. It represents enlargement and compression.
If scale factor |k|>1, then it represent enlargement. If scale factor |k|<1, then it represent compression.
In option C, the scale factor is 4. It means the sides of image are 4 times of the preimage.
Therefore option C is correct and the resultant figure of option C is not congruent to the original figure.