Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Reduction to normal from using lambda-reduction:
The given lambda - calculus terms is, (λf. λx. f (f x)) (λy. Y * 3) 2
For the term, (λy. Y * 3) 2, we can substitute the value to the function.
Therefore, applying beta- reduction on "(λy. Y * 3) 2" will return 2*3= 6
So the term becomes,(λf. λx. f (f x)) 6
The first term, (λf. λx. f (f x)) takes a function and an argument, and substitute the argument in the function.
Here it is given that it is possible to substitute the resulting multiplication in the result.
Therefore by applying next level beta - reduction, the term becomes f(f(f(6)) (f x)) which is in normal form.
Answer:
Has two unkown variables
Step-by-step explanation:
When there is only one equation provided with two unknown variables, it is difficult to solve for the unknown variables
The most simplified version of this equation would be VX = -14
More information would be needed to solve
Answer:
a) 2048
b)164
c)54
d) 11
Step-by-step explanation:
a) A coin has two faces.
Outcome possible =2^11= 2048
b) 8 heads possible outcome = 11!/8!3! = 3971688/241/920= 164 ways
c)2 heads outcome= 11!/2!8!= 39716800/725760=54
d) 7 heads= 11!/7!6! =39716800/3628800 = 11
Same case as Pablo's, more or less.
a = price for the desktop
b = price for the laptop
we know the laptop is 150 bucks more than the desktop,
b = a + 150.
how much is 7% of a? (7/100) * a, 0.07a.
how much is 9.5% of b? (9.5/100) * b, 0.095b.
total interests for the financing add up to 303,
0.07a + 0.095b = 303.
how much was it for the laptop? well b = a + 150.
Answer:
It is a function
Step-by-step explanation:
The x values are different; if they were to be the same, such as (1,7),(2,8),(1,9) it would be incorrect.
